Sid Meier's Civilization VI

Sid Meier's Civilization VI

View Stats:
Lithium Oct 15, 2016 @ 9:50am
Cleopatra is so ugly
it is known that Cleopatra was a beautiful woman but in Civ6 she is extremely ugly. i dunno if this is because of the new style the devs are going for or something else but i advise they should re-do her looks
Last edited by Lithium; Oct 15, 2016 @ 10:25am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 73 comments
Waeress Oct 15, 2016 @ 9:53am 
Umm, she looks beautiful. (Not that it matters in the least)
Greygamer Oct 15, 2016 @ 9:55am 
It's a bit of a myth it seems...
Plutarch indicates that "her beauty, as we are told, was in itself neither altogether incomparable, nor such as to strike those who saw her." Rather, what ultimately made Cleopatra attractive were her wit, charm and "sweetness in the tones of her voice.
Sugam Oct 15, 2016 @ 9:58am 
its cartoonish what you expect. the only people that love it are the well...wierd micky mouse people. kind like old single crazy ladies with 100 cats. ya its on that level.
Darkwing Oct 15, 2016 @ 10:07am 
I'd make a move on her, but that's just me, I guess.
Bouncer Oct 15, 2016 @ 10:09am 
She does have a very pretty nose though.
Last edited by Bouncer; Oct 15, 2016 @ 10:10am
Rhudda Oct 15, 2016 @ 10:19am 
Originally posted by Sugam:
its cartoonish what you expect. the only people that love it are the well...wierd micky mouse people. kind like old single crazy ladies with 100 cats. ya its on that level.

The word you're looking for is caricature, not cartoon.



Originally posted by Bouncer:
She does have a very pretty nose though.

Did you see her nose, Dogmatix?
Cyprus Hillbilly Oct 15, 2016 @ 10:21am 
Cleopatra is in Civ5?
Hobo Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:13am 
Beauty is subjective, not universal.
Dai Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:18am 
Originally posted by Hobo:
Beauty is subjective, not universal.
Fear not - stupidity is.
People asking for re-do's of Leaders....taking away time of the team to design new leaders (and civs)
[implied facepalm.jpg goes here]
easytarget Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:21am 
Originally posted by Lithium:
it is known that Cleopatra was a beautiful woman but in Civ6 she is extremely ugly. i dunno if this is because of the new style the devs are going for or something else but i advise they should re-do her looks
Sounds like Trump.
Lithium Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:32am 


Originally posted by Dai:
Originally posted by Hobo:
Beauty is subjective, not universal.
Fear not - stupidity is.
People asking for re-do's of Leaders....taking away time of the team to design new leaders (and civs)
[implied facepalm.jpg goes here]
apparently i'm a massive idiot (insert faceplam.jpg here)
Shin Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:36am 
She looks great and her movements and body language are really well done. Personally, I love the leader designs a LOT. I can't wait to see all the different people that Civ6 will have in it when all the DLC is said and done.
Dayve Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:39am 
Cleopatra's famous beauty wasn't conventional beauty. All the powerful men of the world wanted her so badly because she was queen of Egypt. Any man who married her would be king of Egypt. Any children that man had with her would themselves be king/queen of Egypt in the future.

Also she was really good in bed, to put it bluntly.

But she wasn't particularly beautiful. She was the product of several generations of brother-sister incest afterall.
Aoi Arashi Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:45am 
Originally posted by Dayve:
Cleopatra's famous beauty wasn't conventional beauty. All the powerful men of the world wanted her so badly because she was queen of Egypt. Any man who married her would be king of Egypt. Any children that man had with her would themselves be king/queen of Egypt in the future.

Also she was really good in bed, to put it bluntly.

But she wasn't particularly beautiful. She was the product of several generations of brother-sister incest afterall.

Sounded good till the last two statements. The first - there is really no evidence unless Ceasar or Anthony left diaries discussing it (though I've not heard of such). As for the results of inbreeding causing problems, well, "it ain't necessarily so". Further study of genetics on your part is indicated.

Regarding the brother-sister marriages, This Cleopatra's father's mother is not known. There are only guesses. However, there were a bunch of sibling / step-sibling marriages in the preceeding generations. Seemed to work pretty well since this Cleopatria was considered both brilliant and wise.
Last edited by Aoi Arashi; Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:53am
Dayve Oct 15, 2016 @ 11:50am 
Originally posted by trevalynd:
Originally posted by Dayve:
Cleopatra's famous beauty wasn't conventional beauty. All the powerful men of the world wanted her so badly because she was queen of Egypt. Any man who married her would be king of Egypt. Any children that man had with her would themselves be king/queen of Egypt in the future.

Also she was really good in bed, to put it bluntly.

But she wasn't particularly beautiful. She was the product of several generations of brother-sister incest afterall.

Sounded good till the last two statements. The first - there is really no evidence. The second, well, "it ain't necessarily so". Further study of genetics on your part is indicated.

In Egyptian culture of those times (and for thousands of years before) it was quite common for the pharaoh to marry his siter. The pharaoh was a god, afterall, so his sister was also divine and was considered a suitable wife. Many pharaoh's married their sisters, and many pharaohs were born mangled because of it.

The Ptolemies appropriated much of the traditions of the Egyptian pharaohs, and they too married and had children with their siblings.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 73 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Oct 15, 2016 @ 9:50am
Posts: 73