This game is boring and slow

[Warcrimes]

Turns take to long and it takes 3 hours just to reach the renasance.

[Viper]

Its called patience.

[Oz Gaming]

So...you want to finish a game in half an hour ???

[Matta Leão]

Civilization games are not for everyone.

[wayninja]

This thread is boring and slow.

[Warcrimes]

Originally posted by Dr. Sobotta Pinto:

Civilization games are not for everyone.

I have 700 hours on civ 5 this game is awful compared to civ 5 and a waste of money.

[preston.sh]

Have you ever played a Civ game before OP?

[Warcrimes]

Originally posted by gigerAesthetic:

Have you ever played a Civ game before OP?

Civ 4

[Doctor Ryder]

So set game speed to quick, pick a later starting age, done

[wayninja]

Originally posted by Warcrimes:

Originally posted by Dr. Sobotta Pinto:

Civilization games are not for everyone.

I have 700 hours on civ 5 this game is awful compared to civ 5 and a waste of money.

How many hours do you have on Civ II? IV?

We don't care about your hours played epeen. There's lots of folks who have lots of hours on more than just Civ V.

Awful compared to Civ V? How? Civ V was barely playable on launch. It only got "fixed" with the DLC's. Comparing the polish of V to VI just isn't really fair. Comparing them on launch day... yeah... Civ VI is way better. Not perfect, but way better and with much more potential.

[Warcrimes]

Originally posted by wayninja:

Originally posted by Warcrimes:

I have 700 hours on civ 5 this game is awful compared to civ 5 and a waste of money.

How many hours do you have on Civ II? IV?

We don't care about your hours played epeen. There's lots of folks who have lots of hours on more than just Civ V.

Awful compared to Civ V? How? Civ V was barely playable on launch. It only got "fixed" with the DLC's. Comparing the polish of V to VI just isn't really fair. Comparing them on launch day... yeah... Civ VI is way better. Not perfect, but way better and with much more potential.

I dont have civ 4 on steam i bought it off amazon but i suppose like 300 or so, the worse part of this game is the ai and its level of intelelgence using warriors in the renasance.

[Quarterican]

I'm still trying to figure out what this "renasance" is.

[Hex]

Civilization is a game where time is well spent and preserved. It could take hours onto days depending on how much you sit your butt down on that chair.

[Warcrimes]

Originally posted by King Enoshima:

Civilization is a game where time is well spent and preserved. It could take hours onto days depending on how much you sit your butt down on that chair.

You guys dont understand what im saying im saying that nothing interesting happens for the first several eras with very little variety.

[alexh0079]

It's boring to the OP because there's more thought (and city planning/organization) required in building your civ as opposed to CiV V.

[wayninja]

Originally posted by Warcrimes:

Originally posted by wayninja:

How many hours do you have on Civ II? IV?

We don't care about your hours played epeen. There's lots of folks who have lots of hours on more than just Civ V.

Awful compared to Civ V? How? Civ V was barely playable on launch. It only got "fixed" with the DLC's. Comparing the polish of V to VI just isn't really fair. Comparing them on launch day... yeah... Civ VI is way better. Not perfect, but way better and with much more potential.

I dont have civ 4 on steam i bought it off amazon but i suppose like 300 or so, the worse part of this game is the ai and its level of intelelgence using warriors in the renasance.

I haven't encountered this. What level are you playing on? How many games have you managed to get through alredy? It's only been out 2 days...

I'm playing the Germans on Prince, and still on my first game even though I've played for at least 15 hours. The Romans across the ocean are my biggest rival and still several tech levels behind me. Despite that, their military units are equal or beyond my. Attacking my city on his contient with corps/armies of mech infantry, AT, and Tanks.

I have seen a few 'older' units that he has, but he seems to be upgrading as he can afford it. I've seen city states with warriors in the modern age, but not sure that bothers me much.

The AI needs some work, but that doesn't surprise me. I don't think I've seen a Civ game in a long time that had a robust/good AI right out of the box. This seems fair for what we've seen in the past.