Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, the Panama Canal seems to be pretty weak, even for a Civ 6 wonder. Well, it's up to the devs in the end.
It could still make it in later, I mean we got another Temple wonder this expansion so maybe they'll revisit the idea in the next expansion.
Namely they go after things that are well known.. and that'd be my pick for a dam.
The issue, given the environmental emphasis in some aspects of this version, may be that large scale hydro-electric schemes are no longer seen as entirely beneficial as their negative impacts on the ecology of entire regions becomes apparent. Even apparently small things can have major consequences. I watched a television documentary about the state of the Yangtze river recently and was surprised to learn that the Three Gorges Dam has elevators that can lift ships displacing several thousand tonnes but does not have fish ladders - so it blocks fish migration to spawning grounds which is damaging or destroying river fisheries that people have relied on for generations. There are many other examples of damage, both economic and environmental, resulting from dams (with or without hydro power). So maybe they are not so wonderful.