Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Usually just set disasters to 0 in settings. Really dont see an improvement to gameplay or gamedepth with any of the "enviromentalism and disaster" content frankly....mostly due to it being as boring as it was in sim city 2000, just a negative event has occured, now you rebuild or undo the damage. Why cant a tsunami happen and reveal a sunken artifact, or an earthquake reveal a special tile with resources ect.
Also does the game do less disasters if you follow "green initiatives?" assuming if i go full on greenpeace with my civ that ill see less disasters or is it cumulative across all teams?
Build preserves 2 tiles away from it, improve with the Grove and the Sanctuary and reap the spoils.
Volcanoes, like all mountains, increase the appeal of neighboring tiles a fair bit, which is why Neighboorhoods get so much housing there.
One of the disasters, though I don't know if its affected by the slider, is a Meteor Impact. (added in one of the Frontier Pass DLCs I believe). The first player to get a unit to that tile (or coastal raids the tile) receives a free cavalry-type unit. That may be the sort of thing you're looking for.
Climate change does increase the severity of disasters, so staying green will help. I don't know if it changes the amount of disasters, though.
And in reality, I also think most civ's did start near(ish) of a vulcano. Having said that, I was wondering who was getting the other end of the statistical stick, since I get vulcanoes way less often then I want or should.
I'd strongly disagree with that, whilst many cites developed around such, core civs rarely did; on the grand scheme. Now they can offer advantages but around starting cites are far more an issue than a boon. Particularity when a catastrophic eruption happens early game wiping out 2/3+ of your pops, this even worse when it happens before you even get a second city..
2. I have more than 8000 hours in Civ. 6. At first I would play the deck, i.e. start at the top of the leaders list and play thru. When the disaster's showed up I did that again to check how specific disasters affect different civ's. I have not had a volcano within the shadow of my capital in more than a year and a half.