Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, no need to get political on a gaming thread. You don't like the game implementation of worldwide flooding, that's fine. But with the game itself, you can't turn the entire thing off, much like you can't remove World Congress, or Religion.
I did not buy storm, so I don't know exactly what its like in game, but it didn't sound like a good use of my money, and still does not. I can't tell that you can use 'environmental weaponry' as effectively here, the maps are too small and screwy and most of what I saw looked random rather than provoked.
What’s that even supposed to mean?
Somebody will complain about any particular thing in the universe, so, as a guide “somebody complained” is a rubbish metric.
However, there is an expectation to avoid politically-driven hellthreads.
The worst consequences of Civ VI climate change are usually pretty trivial on the default settings. Of course OMMV.
Watching folk bring out their hobby horses for some exercise is always good for a laugh. Doesn't leave me inclined to help them much usually though.
If it’s such too strident propaganda for someone to handle, they’ve always got the standard ruleset or the scenarios with which to recreate.
Global warming also useful to gauge when another civ is modernizing. You know where they are at on tech.