Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But this is exactly one of my examples of poor diplomatic behaviour in my negative review for the game.
Don't get me wrong, i enjoy the game. But i'm not going to lie and say it has much over Civ 5 at this current point. It certainly hasn't earned its price tag either.
The way game development currently works is stupid. You can pick up a brand new release for £60 which is totally broken, or buy it's far superior predecessor, where everything works properly for a fraction of what you paid for the new release.
It will be the same with Civ 6. When it's actually good it'll be cheap as chips.
Goes without saying but i'm not buying another Civ game on release. Civ 5, BE and 6 have all had these terrible launches.