Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Civ III is where the game really kicked out from the depth.
My own opinion is that there is no "best" civ game, all have something to offer and all have significant flaws. The older ones are of their time and can seem rather dated now. If you like it then play and enjoy it rather than wasting that time posting here.
If you ask me, though, three and four were direct improvements over their predecessors. Five has a lot of things I like, but the change to one unit per tile was where the AI took a real hit. So five leaves me with mixed feelings, even when I'm enjoying a modded campaign of it. I liked the change from doomstacks to 1UPT, but the trade-off was hard to swallow.
I cobbled together an old Dell PC from dumpster diving a local office park, for my first PC that I didn't have to share with the rest of the family. It was a 386 and I "upgraded" to Win95 by borrowing a friend's dad's license. I played Civ II for HOURS at a time and it wasn't until months later that I was able to scrounge a sound card for the thing and I remember being blown away by the sound track.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDBDC24A037ECEA67