Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Better to wait until civ 6 is patched and expanded to a reasonable degree before he buys it.
see you in 2 more years, when this game is at the price it deserves (12 or less)
So what if Civ 5 has been out longer than Civ 6. Just becuase Civ 5 is out longer, does that make it better? If anything, since Civ V has been out longer you would think Firaxis would have learned from Civ V and Civ VI should have been better. So how come Civ VI is worse than Civ V for you to say that Civ V was out longer?