METAL GEAR SOLID V: THE PHANTOM PAIN

METAL GEAR SOLID V: THE PHANTOM PAIN

Frank Castle 23 AGO 2015 a las 0:15
MGS V's MotherBase building vs. Fallout 4's Base Building.
<Title> :eagleeye:
< >
Mostrando 16-30 de 43 comentarios
Like many are already saying, the base building in both games are very different and that's not even bringing in how different the games are in the first place. But considering Fallout 4's engine and the fact that people are going to do all sorts of wonderful things with mods, Fallout 4 would technically be superior in this regard.

I must emphasize again, both games are still very different and the base building have different purposes in regards to gameplay.

Publicado originalmente por johncage:
going with mgs v's because fo4's art direction sucks and the aesthetics are vastly ingerior and lack originality and innovation.

the blue jumpsuit looks like ♥♥♥♥, both art, aeshtetic wise, and the fact that it doesn't look realistic and convincing. it looks like neoprene.

Obvious fanboy is obvious.
Última edición por Mr JC Denton in Da Fresh; 23 AGO 2015 a las 9:51
Tumas Altaawus (Bloqueado) 23 AGO 2015 a las 9:52 
Motherbase all the way. Miles more depth and customisation. FO4 is a game for casuals.
Publicado originalmente por Chargeback Thomas:
Motherbase all the way. Miles more depth and customisation. FO4 is a game for casuals.

Fallout is a totally different type of game and is more focused on exploration, of course there's no hardcore stealth. Also, it's Fallout 4 with more customization, considering you can build from the ground up.
Última edición por Mr JC Denton in Da Fresh; 23 AGO 2015 a las 9:58
Helghast Trooper 23 AGO 2015 a las 9:57 
Publicado originalmente por Chargeback Thomas:
Motherbase all the way. Miles more depth and customisation. FO4 is a game for casuals.
i think fallout 4 base has more customisation tho.
Tumas Altaawus (Bloqueado) 23 AGO 2015 a las 9:58 
Publicado originalmente por {MGS} ~~P.A.I.N~~#8days!!:
Publicado originalmente por Chargeback Thomas:
Motherbase all the way. Miles more depth and customisation. FO4 is a game for casuals.
i think fallout 4 base has more customisation tho.
Doesn't have the micromanaging of 100s of units and resources, researching/upgrading, as well as perfecting your defence against other players.
Helghast Trooper 23 AGO 2015 a las 9:59 
Publicado originalmente por Chargeback Thomas:
Publicado originalmente por {MGS} ~~P.A.I.N~~#8days!!:
i think fallout 4 base has more customisation tho.
Doesn't have the micromanaging of 100s of units and resources, researching/upgrading, as well as perfecting your defence against other players.
thats true,but you can build it however you want in fallout 4.
Última edición por Helghast Trooper; 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:00
Tumas Altaawus (Bloqueado) 23 AGO 2015 a las 9:59 
Publicado originalmente por Mr Impossible:
Publicado originalmente por Chargeback Thomas:
Motherbase all the way. Miles more depth and customisation. FO4 is a game for casuals.

Fallout is a totally different type of game and is more focused on exploration, of course there's no hardcore stealth. Also, it's Fallout 4 with more customization, considering you can build from the ground up.
You build motherbase from the ground up too. You choose what platforms to build. You choose their colour, their staff, their production, etc. FO4 has none of that.
railworks 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:00 
Publicado originalmente por Mr Impossible:
Publicado originalmente por Chargeback Thomas:
Motherbase all the way. Miles more depth and customisation. FO4 is a game for casuals.

Fallout is a totally different type of game and is more focused on exploration, of course there's no hardcore stealth.
fallout is a more personal adventre with more customisation.

while mgsv is less about you, and more about your army, and big boss giveing less customisation, and more story depth, while also giveing great customisation, and gamplay.
thats why i got both.
Tumas Altaawus (Bloqueado) 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:02 
Publicado originalmente por MasterRazzerr76:
Publicado originalmente por Chargeback Thomas:
You build motherbase from the ground up too. You choose what platforms to build. You choose their colour, their staff, their production, etc. FO4 has none of that.
How do you know and not every single soldier in PP is gonna be interactable
TPP is based on Peace Walker. Every soldier you fultoned can be automatically assigned, or you can choose where they work based on their stats. Everything I've stated has been confirmed in various interviews and gameplay trailers.
Última edición por Tumas Altaawus; 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:02
johncage (Bloqueado) 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:08 
fallout 4 is for people with want of taste, imho
Última edición por johncage; 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:09
Munoko ya Nyoka 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:10 
Fallout 4 definitely has more customization in terms of aesthetics, but I feel TPP's mother base is a lot more polished and looks less out of place. Sorry to bash on Fallout, but the base looks kind of like a gimmicky mod in my opinion.
Helghast Trooper 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:11 
Publicado originalmente por SUNĒKU:
Fallout 4 definitely has more customization in terms of aesthetics, but I feel TPP's mother base is a lot more polished and looks less out of place. Sorry to bash on Fallout, but the base looks kind of like a gimmicky mod in my opinion.
Haha! yeah thats true! but its a very nice feature for fallout series,it was actuely one of my wishlist for fallout 4.
johncage (Bloqueado) 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:28 
Publicado originalmente por SUNĒKU:
Fallout 4 definitely has more customization in terms of aesthetics, but I feel TPP's mother base is a lot more polished and looks less out of place. Sorry to bash on Fallout, but the base looks kind of like a gimmicky mod in my opinion.

yep, people want to sidestep the issue by claiming apples and oranges. yet if talking about aesthetics and customization, and sheer scale, obviously mgs wins, hands down. if people want some gimmicky tiny scrappy afterthought introduced through design by committee likely after they saw mgs 5 was doing it, they are free to do so. also fo4's base and the gameplay interactions described for it make it sound like piss poor design.

besthesda has bad artists and worse design and gameplay directors.
Última edición por johncage; 23 AGO 2015 a las 10:28
Impoxdragon 23 AGO 2015 a las 11:19 
Publicado originalmente por Mattee:
But it's like comparing apples with oranges.
But those are both fruit and grow on trees.
railworks 23 AGO 2015 a las 11:24 
Publicado originalmente por Impoxdragon:
Publicado originalmente por Mattee:
But it's like comparing apples with oranges.
But those are both fruit and grow on trees.
yeah. but they both have different taste. fallout is a game about adventuring a nuclear wasteland, where mgsv is about growing an army to reap revenge. i say get both you can't go wrong.
Última edición por railworks; 23 AGO 2015 a las 11:29
< >
Mostrando 16-30 de 43 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 23 AGO 2015 a las 0:15
Mensajes: 43