Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
OT:
I've heard conflicting reports about performance differences. The official Nvidia blog says they experienced dips on their test rig.
Imo, yeah, the halos are a bit of an eyesore, but if it's going to make an already subtle effect even more subtle *and* supposedly cause a however slight performance decrease, I'd pass on it.
FXAA is performance free, it also works on games that don't support proper AA. So no, it is godlike for older, low-end rigs. And especially useful for engines that don't support standard AA, or any kind of AA. And i am not talking about newer engines with deferred lighting either. But older games that use DX6.
And obviously any AA is better than no AA, even if it's shader based.