Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
We're talking about AI, or simulations of brains, Hammets as applied to the subject matter would be the simulation of neurochemical connections within the brain that are used for processing information. For a central AI, it would be similar to processing memories, the key application of GW and the system. It's quite possible that Hammets are a generally accepted byproduct of the concept, it can be applied both to human processors and AI, but is an extremely dark and taboo subject in many regards. Let's not forget Emma's talk on human genes and the scientific communities...or Rose and Jack's discussion about information control within the matrix...