METAL GEAR SOLID V: THE PHANTOM PAIN

METAL GEAR SOLID V: THE PHANTOM PAIN

Force Asleep Aug 14, 2017 @ 8:48am
Raiden suit in FOB missions?
A friend of mine told me he has encountered an intruder with Raiden suit while defending my base, and this suit isn't supposed to be useable in FOB missions? And he also said when the intruder fell off he received the ransom from him, which should only happen when you have killed or knocked out your enemies? He suspects the guy was a cheater, as do I. I had encountered at least 20 defenders/intruders and never seen this happening before.

The intruder's ID is Devilwolf_900, if you see this thread explain.

I have also found out one of the intruder who has 4 level 78 FOBs, but only has 18 x S, 14 x A++,7 x A+, 16 x A, 14 x B and 8 x C soliders. and over 2 million materials of each type, except for precious meteal, which is over 1 million. While high level equipment do level up the base to a level and let's assume all his equipment are fully developed, but with so few soliders it's just seems impossible to me.

Player's ID: lauret906

Screenshots of his base information.

http://imgur.com/haZsMNQ


http://imgur.com/GO03P47

Could anyone please explain to me what have I been missing.
Last edited by Force Asleep; Aug 14, 2017 @ 8:49am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 33 comments
Candle Jack Aug 14, 2017 @ 8:53am 
What makes you think it isn't supposed to be used in FOB missions?

I see no such restriction in the suit's description.

Using it to infiltrate is not what I would pick. Stealth wise it's the same as O.D.

But I love using it too defend... Most intruders dont seem to expect it...

You load into your base and within a minute you're on top of them and they're ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ their pants cause the speed of your assault just totally catches them off guard.
!RJ_Truth Aug 14, 2017 @ 8:56am 
Raiden Suit is usable in FOB. It says it isn't, but it is. Devilwolf is a top notching non-cheating legit player. He's insanely good. If you're on his $#!+ list. I'm sorry. It's going to be a long month. He's good. Really good.

lauret is also a legit player that has been playing for a long long time. Much longer than I have. I suspect low staff counts are due to not replenishing staff. He's at the point that staff don't really matter and base is fully leveled up and I'm sure all his developments are too and has been for a long time.

Devil is easily explained. Lauret. There may be a little question, but these are both really good guys who have been around a long long time. The only thing I would worry about from either of these two is being on the receiving end of their wrath. :) As far as cheating... I would not suspect that from either of these two.
Oxi Aug 14, 2017 @ 8:58am 
Greetings Sir,

You get paid the ransom whenever the opponent dies, regardless of the cause of death. Also, raiden suit is useable in FOB.

Devilwolf is a well known good PVP player.

Lauret's base appears as such as he is insured. S++ and S+ numbers will not be shown. It is also possible to have high amounts of resources if you succeed in infiltrations enough.

Thank You
Force Asleep Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:00am 
Originally posted by CandLe-Jack:
What makes you think it isn't supposed to be used in FOB missions?

I see no such restriction in the suit's description.

Using it to infiltrate is not what I would pick. Stealth wise it's the same as O.D.

But I love using it too defend... Most intruders dont seem to expect it...

You load into your base and within a minute you're on top of them and they're ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ their pants cause the speed of your assault just totally catches them off guard.
Ok so it is, I didn't know as I don't have it to test out neither did my friend.

Force Asleep Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:00am 
I do have that Cyborg ninja suit though.
Oxi Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:04am 
Greetings Sir,

The Ninja suit is not the same as the raiden suit.

Perhaps you may want to acquire it first and try it out.

Thank You
Candle Jack Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:06am 
Originally posted by Force Asleep:
Originally posted by CandLe-Jack:
What makes you think it isn't supposed to be used in FOB missions?

I see no such restriction in the suit's description.

Using it to infiltrate is not what I would pick. Stealth wise it's the same as O.D.

But I love using it too defend... Most intruders dont seem to expect it...

You load into your base and within a minute you're on top of them and they're ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ their pants cause the speed of your assault just totally catches them off guard.
Ok so it is, I didn't know as I don't have it to test out neither did my friend.

30 seconds on google could have told you that.

Instead you took it upon yourself to slander 2 more players without good cause, just irrational paranoia based in ignorance.

Next time you suspect something like this do a little independant research before you go throwing accusations around.
Last edited by Candle Jack; Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:06am
cosy-hillbilly Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:08am 
Funny thread :) BTW, next time when I love 'n hug 'n squeeze your base ta pieces, I'll make sure your guards actual die instead of getting just injured. That they didn't die was my bad. I admit that I did a lousy job on that, lol. Cheers
!RJ_Truth Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:17am 
Originally posted by CandLe-Jack:
Originally posted by Force Asleep:
Ok so it is, I didn't know as I don't have it to test out neither did my friend.

30 seconds on google could have told you that.

Instead you took it upon yourself to slander 2 more players without good cause, just irrational paranoia based in ignorance.

Next time you suspect something like this do a little independant research before you go throwing accusations around.

Questioning isn't slander. There was a point in time that I questioned Devil myself, but that was early on in my FOB development and up to that point I had not run into anyone that was nearly as good as he is. I didn't call him by name without proof, so I questioned what I saw.

I look at this as the same. Questioning what the OP saw and asking for an explanation. That isn't slander at all.

Edit: Questioning is how we learn. I see nothing wrong with questioning and looking for answers. I do not see this OP as accusing. He's just looking for answers to questions that he has based on what he's observed.
Last edited by !RJ_Truth; Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:18am
Oxi Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:25am 
Originally posted by GeekDoctor:
Originally posted by CandLe-Jack:

30 seconds on google could have told you that.

Instead you took it upon yourself to slander 2 more players without good cause, just irrational paranoia based in ignorance.

Next time you suspect something like this do a little independant research before you go throwing accusations around.

Questioning isn't slander. There was a point in time that I questioned Devil myself, but that was early on in my FOB development and up to that point I had not run into anyone that was nearly as good as he is. I didn't call him by name without proof, so I questioned what I saw.

I look at this as the same. Questioning what the OP saw and asking for an explanation. That isn't slander at all.

Edit: Questioning is how we learn. I see nothing wrong with questioning and looking for answers. I do not see this OP as accusing. He's just looking for answers to questions that he has based on what he's observed.

Greetings Sir,

We all learn with experience. As force asleep may not have encountered that many intruders (at least 20 does not suggest too much experience), he may be ignorant of some facts.

With time (and more intruders), he would surely learn more. We were all at that learning stage for PVP/FOBs in general/Story mode before.

Thank You
Force Asleep Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:26am 
Originally posted by CandLe-Jack:
Originally posted by Force Asleep:
Ok so it is, I didn't know as I don't have it to test out neither did my friend.

30 seconds on google could have told you that.

Instead you took it upon yourself to slander 2 more players without good cause, just irrational paranoia based in ignorance.

Next time you suspect something like this do a little independant research before you go throwing accusations around.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/slander
jojosmojojo Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:29am 
Originally posted by GeekDoctor:

Questioning isn't slander. There was a point in time that I questioned Devil myself, but that was early on in my FOB development and up to that point I had not run into anyone that was nearly as good as he is. I didn't call him by name without proof, so I questioned what I saw.

I look at this as the same. Questioning what the OP saw and asking for an explanation. That isn't slander at all.

I support what GD said. Previously, OP was accusatory without evidence. This time, he is inquisitive with some effort on showing proof.

To OP:
As others have said, Raiden suit is usable in FOB. Before *9 gear was out, it was still viable to use it during PvP and nuke runs. Now people use it for a quick smash and grab on low level bases, sprinting through empty FOBs for resources and medals, or bum rushing noobs to the core at the start of PvP. That is probably why the Raiden suit user killed himself, since he is usually open to PvP.

As for lauret, he is using insurance as others have said again. Active PvPers usually get insurance before going on a raid spree to bait PvP, and hope that the revenge wormhole will be closed while insurance is up. Having insurance hides S++ and S+ soldiers while looking at the FOB list, but looking at the platform list you should see S+ and above soldiers in each platform. Another way to tell is if the guard rank is E. If an insurance user only has S+ and above soldiers in the security team, auto-generated E rank guards will guard the FOB. There will be no reinforcements.
Candle Jack Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:34am 
Originally posted by Force Asleep:
He suspects the guy was a cheater, as do I.

You had no reason to, had you done your due diligence you would have known better.

Instead you came here and publicly accused innocent peole of being cheaters... Cause that is exactly what you did.

You came here, made an accusation, cause that's what you're doing by describing what you find as suspect behavior and then give said persons names.

"Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime"

That is exactly what you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ did here, I don't care how innocently you phrased it, that is what you did.
Candle Jack Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:35am 
Originally posted by jojosmojojo:
I support what GD said. Previously, OP was accusatory without evidence. This time, he is inquisitive with some effort on showing proof.

Except he had zero actual proof.

Just his assumptions.

Don't defend this, this is the second time since I've been here that this guy and/or his friend got spanked, and he immediately decided to cry hacker in the forums instead of just doing a miniscule amount of research.
Last edited by Candle Jack; Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:39am
Force Asleep Aug 14, 2017 @ 9:39am 
Originally posted by CandLe-Jack:
Originally posted by Force Asleep:
He suspects the guy was a cheater, as do I.

You had no reason to, had you done your due diligence you would have known better.

Instead you came here and publicly accused innocent peole of being cheaters... Cause that is exactly what you did.

You came here, made an accusation, cause that's what you're doing by describing what you find as suspect behavior and then give said persons names.

"Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime"

That is exactly what you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ did here, I don't care how innocently you phrased it, that is what you did.
So suspecting someone = accusing?

Ok.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 33 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Aug 14, 2017 @ 8:48am
Posts: 33