How to begin Act 3?

[GustavGlaven]

I thought I was playing Act 3, but the game just kept giving me missions I already finished. I justt finished "truth: the man who sold the world". What mission starts act 3?

[!RJ_Truth]

Publicado originalmente por Holografix:

Publicado originalmente por Epic The Incandescent:

would be cool if the community would get together and orginize and event to disarm all nukes, even if its only for a scant few hours at most, would be pretty cool to see how the community divides and in fights from it. Heh we could get unofficial alliances set up too.

what community?

Yes, I'll agree with that sentiment. Community requires collaboration. How many of us are there in here on a regular basis? 10-20 people out of how many people actively playing? Most people only come here when they have a problem and don't engage as a community, so that makes it impossible to even get a simple majority working towards the same goal.

[No_Quarter]

Nuclear Disarmament was a feature designed by Kojima to show how in real world people will never agree to have peace.
So no, promoting nuclear disarmament does not fit the story

[!RJ_Truth]

Publicado originalmente por No_Quarter:

Nuclear Disarmament was a feature designed by Kojima to show how in real world people will never agree to have peace.
So no, promoting nuclear disarmament does not fit the story

It was just an example of how taking the words at face value could be flawed. No, I believe it was to intentionally mislead for whatever reason was in their head at the time and the only thing that it unlocks is the cutscene. Additional content would be revealed in the data mining. That is the point.

[GustavGlaven]

Publicado originalmente por blee717:

Publicado originalmente por No_Quarter:

this is not confirmed, it is a rumor made by tryhard ranting youtubers who would rant on their own mother for views... not a sinle thing backing it up but feel of phantom pain, they feel something was there but it isn't... There, there goes a 4-th wall

Kojima stated in one of his interciews that game is as he wanted it to be from the beginning

This is basically it. When the Definitive Experience was announced, somone asked why it's called Definitive when it doesn't include Chapter 3 and an official twitter response basically said the road to nuclear disarmament is Chapter 3 and that cutscene is the reward. The game definitely feels incomplete but if that's Kojima's vision, then he must be slipping in telling a complete story.

I doubt he was slipping. They released an unfinished game (as is typical these days), and fired kojima. He isn't there to finish it.

[!RJ_Truth]

Publicado originalmente por GustavGlaven:

Publicado originalmente por blee717:

This is basically it. When the Definitive Experience was announced, somone asked why it's called Definitive when it doesn't include Chapter 3 and an official twitter response basically said the road to nuclear disarmament is Chapter 3 and that cutscene is the reward. The game definitely feels incomplete but if that's Kojima's vision, then he must be slipping in telling a complete story.

I doubt he was slipping. They released an unfinished game (as is typical these days), and fired kojima. He isn't there to finish it.

The story line for this game is complete. Again, it ended with Mission 31. The rest is just wrap up.

[No_Quarter]

Publicado originalmente por GustavGlaven:

I doubt he was slipping. They released an unfinished game (as is typical these days), and fired kojima. He isn't there to finish it.

lol.....

[No_Quarter]

it is so funny to see so many people in pain for Chapter 3 and no one being able to read the title of the game, you know, the thing that goes after the MGSV

[Holografix]

Publicado originalmente por GustavGlaven:

I doubt he was slipping. They released an unfinished game (as is typical these days), and fired kojima. He isn't there to finish it.

The cry for cut content is a cry for either narrative resolution or more gameplay. Most opinions or arguments that rely on the business practices of Konami/Kojima are nonsense and pure speculation because unless you were part of Konami's staff/employees/management then you really know nothing.

Publicado originalmente por GeekDoctor:

The story line for this game is complete. Again, it ended with Mission 31. The rest is just wrap up.

I agree with this. Mainly because if you paid attention to the narrative, Skullface's plan was to flood the war economy with nukes and create a revenge style economy with no language other than nuclear weaponary.

And look! Here we are talking about the possible missing pieces of game (we have no words for this loss, other than vague speculation about the inner workings of a company we do not work for) through the language of nuclear disarmament in a game system designed around retaliation and revenge. Skullface is winning!! Unless we come together and disarm all the nukes Skullface implanted in the PF system then we will not get Venom's ending! We are still playing Skullface's game!! This is the true lesson of nuclear disarmament. Mission 46 is actually Big Boss' ending. Venom's ending is at the end of nuclear disarmament.

[GustavGlaven]

Publicado originalmente por Holografix:

Publicado originalmente por GustavGlaven:

I doubt he was slipping. They released an unfinished game (as is typical these days), and fired kojima. He isn't there to finish it.

The cry for cut content is a cry for either narrative resolution or more gameplay. Most opinions or arguments that rely on the business practices of Konami/Kojima are nonsense and pure speculation because unless you were part of Konami's staff/employees/management then you really know nothing.


I am know that they are gone. I also know that according to The composer of mgsv (a konami employeed who worked on mgs v) hideo was fired for having expensive taste in quility content. i also know that right after he was ousted, they withdrew from the games industry.

It isn't logical to think they had a long term plan for this, or that it is even finished. If they would have let the development of this game continue another year for act 3 to be written, they would have had to stay in the industry for another year.


http://www.gamezone.com/news/why-konami-fired-hideo-kojima-according-to-mgs-v-s-composer-3422325

[Holografix]

Publicado originalmente por GustavGlaven:

Publicado originalmente por Holografix:

The cry for cut content is a cry for either narrative resolution or more gameplay. Most opinions or arguments that rely on the business practices of Konami/Kojima are nonsense and pure speculation because unless you were part of Konami's staff/employees/management then you really know nothing.

I am know that they are gone. I also know that according to The composer of mgsv (a konami employeed who worked on mgs v) hideo was fired for having expensive taste in quility content. i also know that right after he was ousted, they withdrew from the games industry.

It isn't logical to think they had a long term plan for this, or that it is even finished. If they would have let the development of this game continue another year for act 3 to be written, they would have had to stay in the industry for another year.

http://www.gamezone.com/news/why-konami-fired-hideo-kojima-according-to-mgs-v-s-composer-3422325

Check the --Updated statement from Rika Muranaka-- at the end of the article. She clarifies that her words were misinterpreted and mistranslated. Anyway, this article is not about why Hideo left Konami. It's about what Rika thinks about Kojima as a game creator and what Rika thinks about Konami as a business. Not about anything real. It's speculation.

[!RJ_Truth]

Publicado originalmente por Holografix:

Venom's ending is at the end of nuclear disarmament.

Venom's ending, I believe, was in the original Metal Gear back in the 80's. :P

[GustavGlaven]

Publicado originalmente por Holografix:

Publicado originalmente por GustavGlaven:

I am know that they are gone. I also know that according to The composer of mgsv (a konami employeed who worked on mgs v) hideo was fired for having expensive taste in quility content. i also know that right after he was ousted, they withdrew from the games industry.

It isn't logical to think they had a long term plan for this, or that it is even finished. If they would have let the development of this game continue another year for act 3 to be written, they would have had to stay in the industry for another year.

http://www.gamezone.com/news/why-konami-fired-hideo-kojima-according-to-mgs-v-s-composer-3422325

Check the --Updated statement from Rika Muranaka-- at the end of the article. She clarifies that her words were misinterpreted and mistranslated. Anyway, this article is not about why Hideo left Konami. It's about what Rika thinks about Kojima as a game creator and what Rika thinks about Konami as a business. Not about anything real. It's speculation.

You're right about the updated statement, but the article is about why they parted. It is intent of the interview. The updated statement is about what Rika thinks about kojima as a game creator and konami as a business. While not being asked any questions about why hideo was fired.

[Holografix]

Publicado originalmente por GeekDoctor:

Publicado originalmente por Holografix:

Venom's ending is at the end of nuclear disarmament.

Venom's ending, I believe, was in the original Metal Gear back in the 80's. :P

yeah, Venom's actual ending of life. Chronologically Venom dies (ends) in 1995, but I think his ending like Quiet, Skullface, and Big Boss before him in V, is at the end of nuclear disarmament.

Publicado originalmente por GustavGlaven:

Publicado originalmente por Holografix:

Check the --Updated statement from Rika Muranaka-- at the end of the article. She clarifies that her words were misinterpreted and mistranslated. Anyway, this article is not about why Hideo left Konami. It's about what Rika thinks about Kojima as a game creator and what Rika thinks about Konami as a business. Not about anything real. It's speculation.

You're right about the updated statement, but the article is about why they parted. It is intent of the interview. The updated statement is about what Rika thinks about kojima as a game creator and konami as a business. While not being asked any questions about why hideo was fired.

You are correct. Gamezone's intent was to use Rika's interview in their article as a basis to explain Kojima's/Konami's separation. But if the interviewed subject, in this case Rika, releases a statement about her words being mistranslated and misinterpreted by Gamezone, well then, Gamezone's article, no matter what their intention, just looks like bad journalism or at the very best, pure speculation.