Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"dumb feature IRL" when absolutely isn't. Start/stop systems work to save fuel whilst idling for prolongued periods of time, and with the efficiencies of modern engines it's a perfectly viable feature in a car, and your wallet will thank you for the money saved in the long-term.
It's not just one cent, it's more, and from a full tank to empty you gain quite a bit with the feature. With modern engines it's highly unlikely it uses more fuel in the startup (which is also a very quick process), with the fuel already in the system being used to start up.
im a mechanic and around here we have alot of modern "Lease" cars and for that it doesnt matter, stuff breaks? just bring it back to the leasing company. to those people it doesnt matter if the engine wears faster, theyll just get a different car if that one breaks.
also we have some of the highest gas prices around the world here.
He's not saying to be careless about a vehicle, he's saying it's just nature for cars to have breaking components, but the start/stop feature won't make it especially easy to break