安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Like most post-update game-breaking beamng bugs, it probably doesn’t happen for most people. Granted, we can’t know for sure, but it is safe to assume the same for this.
You do realize that a majority of the posts on this forum since the update came out are complaints about things being broken and a lot of them mention the exact same issues, right? So either they're making it up (extremely unlikely with how many people are complaining) or there's a legitimate issue. Sticking your head in the sand isn't going to make those complaints disappear.
Let's apply Occam's Razor here. Either you just lucked out or a majority of people are incompetent.
1. You lucking out simply requires you to have a system setup that is favorable to the new update. That doesn't necessarily mean better performing - it's possible that the update introduced something that works well on one particular brand or model line of hardware but not others. It's pure random chance and the odds aren't exactly that unlikely as it's happened before with a LOT of games.
2. Everyone else being incompetent requires you to be above a certain level of competence that a vast majority of the player base isn't. This is an EXTREMELY large assumption to make, and by definition is very unlikely.
Occam's Razor dictates that, in an absence of sufficient evidence of another possibility, the most likely reason is the one that requires the fewest and smallest assumptions. As a result, possibility 1, "you just lucked out", is the possibility that is supported by Occam's Razor. Sorry, but you're not some hyper-competent computing genius.
Of course, there's also the possibility that something else is going on behind the scenes here, but all I'll say is that I have my suspicions.
1. We can only go by what we see, so unless someone does a survey or something we have to go by activity.
2. While that's true that initial posts would only be made by people having issues, followup posts wouldn't necessarily follow suit. People who don't have problems might still want to give their own feedback. Perhaps they have some advice on how to fix or at least mitigate the issue, or perhaps they just want to be argumentative like Maddest_Max, but either way the comments on an initial post are going to give a more balanced view on the issue than just the initial posts themselves.
I build my own computers as a hobby and I have several years of admittedly informal experience in software development, electronics design and robotics, so I do believe that what you're saying here is the equivalent of telling an F1 driver how to drive because you know someone who races Go-Karts.