Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It was made by massive entertainment, and the game was actually pretty good. Aside from the base destroying gameplay loop which you can mostly ignore, the main story and side quests were actually pretty good.
You cannot work that one out by yourself and have to ask others!!
For those who don't know there was a period of time when a lot of movie games flooded the market made by no-name studios who knew nothing about gaming that made awful short 4-hour experiences to tie in with movie releases and tried to pass them off as full priced games.
The 2009 game was a little better than most of those but it has nothing that makes you want to go back and play it again...
Ever heard of the expressions 'Looks can be deceptive' and 'Perceptions can be warped with out first-hand experience'?
map has 3 distinct areas to unlock
player must kill RDA troops, destroy buildings and helping na'vi to gain enough points to take over a sector
player can collect resources to craft items
players can help na'vi to gain points to buy weapons
The UI, how the character moves and fights, the way everyone moves, the look of the map and sectors, even down to how they talk and the plot of the game, are all just reskinned farcry features.
In this instance looks are not deceiving, ive watched plenty of gameplay footage and reviews, it's a far cry reskin, and a ♥♥♥♥ one at that.