Salt and Sacrifice not looking so good.

[Wrinkly]

Well now we know why they took Epic's money.

Source of Madness doesn't just describe the Epic exclusivity deal, but is a better buy - https://store.steampowered.com/app/1315610/Source_of_Madness/

[Powersword]

Whats this? is it a copy or something?

[Misfit]

nah, a completely different game

[9999999 in 1]

Well, this game looks like ♥♥♥♥.

[DonutSteel]

Sir that's a roguelite

[Merque]

Actually Salt and Sacrifice is quite good. It's premise is different from Sanctuary but fun nonetheless. But I guess this echo chamber here that is mockingly labeled "Discussions" doesn't leave much room for offended audiences not willing to use a new storefront.

[Merik Lobo]

Originally posted by Merque:

Actually Salt and Sacrifice is quite good. It's premise is different from Sanctuary but fun nonetheless. But I guess this echo chamber here that is mockingly labeled "Discussions" doesn't leave much room for offended audiences not willing to use a new storefront.

Im playing it through Epic and enjoying it as well, but, to be fair, Epic is still a god awful excuse for a competitor. Even after all this time they've refused to add any community features like this very forum board we're talking on right now. Its painful going from Steam to that underdeveloped piece of crap. Epic seems to think that if they throw enough money around they dont need to add features to their storefront to stay competetive.

[Codester]

Source of madness is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ why are you posting that game here.

[Douchebag Extraordinaire]

Salt Sac is actually pretty fun. A lot of the basic stuff is really different but the combat is still there.

[No One]

Originally posted by Merque:

I guess this echo chamber here that is mockingly labeled "Discussions"

Welcome to Steam. Enpain your stay!

[Wrinkly]

Having seen Salt and Sanctuary do well on Steam I expected the follow up to also appear on Steam. But no, it seems Epic bought exclusivity. So after searching for reviews I found Salt and Sacrifice wasn't doing so well and having tried a copy that Epic paid for, I have to agree.

At the same time I noticed another, and may I say aptly named, game that play isn't too dissimilar, hence the original post.

Also fun to see people reduced to having to use Steam to discuss the follow up

[Mike]

Originally posted by Wrinkly:

Having seen Salt and Sanctuary do well on Steam I expected the follow up to also appear on Steam. But no, it seems Epic bought exclusivity. So after searching for reviews I found Salt and Sacrifice wasn't doing so well and having tried a copy that Epic paid for, I have to agree.

At the same time I noticed another, and may I say aptly named, game that play isn't too dissimilar, hence the original post.

Also fun to see people reduced to having to use Steam to discuss the follow up

So first you posted about completely wrong game and them say "Also fun to see people reduced to having to use Steam to discuss the follow up " when you one were the one who made the post about the game not on steam lol.

I'm sure the is a discord or reddit to talk about the new game, All steam has over Epic is convenience and many long developed community/social features for people to use. A game on Epic plays the exact same as on Steam, you can even use GOG galaxy to put all of your PC games regardless of the store in 1 place so it a none issue for normal people who just like games ;)

[Wrinkly]

Originally posted by Mike:

Originally posted by Wrinkly:

Having seen Salt and Sanctuary do well on Steam I expected the follow up to also appear on Steam. But no, it seems Epic bought exclusivity. So after searching for reviews I found Salt and Sacrifice wasn't doing so well and having tried a copy that Epic paid for, I have to agree.

At the same time I noticed another, and may I say aptly named, game that play isn't too dissimilar, hence the original post.

Also fun to see people reduced to having to use Steam to discuss the follow up

So first you posted about completely wrong game and them say "Also fun to see people reduced to having to use Steam to discuss the follow up " when you one were the one who made the post about the game not on steam lol.

I'm sure the is a discord or reddit to talk about the new game, All steam has over Epic is convenience and many long developed community/social features for people to use. A game on Epic plays the exact same as on Steam, you can even use GOG galaxy to put all of your PC games regardless of the store in 1 place so it a none issue for normal people who just like games ;)

Wrong game? How can you suggest a better game without mentioning another game? Yes, I mentioned the Salt and Sanctuary not being on Steam, due to not being as good as the first therefore taking Epic's exclusivity cash, and then mentioned the threads where people who were silly enough to fall for it were reduced to using Steam to discuss it as Epic doesn't allow such discussion. So what?

Not all games perform the same on Epic, e.g. modding support maybe lost, patch support maybe delayed. I'm sure there is a discord or reddit for you to attempt to defend Epic also, but here you are

[^_^]

Originally posted by Wrinkly:

Originally posted by Mike:

So first you posted about completely wrong game and them say "Also fun to see people reduced to having to use Steam to discuss the follow up " when you one were the one who made the post about the game not on steam lol.

I'm sure the is a discord or reddit to talk about the new game, All steam has over Epic is convenience and many long developed community/social features for people to use. A game on Epic plays the exact same as on Steam, you can even use GOG galaxy to put all of your PC games regardless of the store in 1 place so it a none issue for normal people who just like games ;)

Wrong game? How can you suggest a better game without mentioning another game? Yes, I mentioned the Salt and Sanctuary not being on Steam, due to not being as good as the first therefore taking Epic's exclusivity cash, and then mentioned the threads where people who were silly enough to fall for it were reduced to using Steam to discuss it as Epic doesn't allow such discussion. So what?

Not all games perform the same on Epic, e.g. modding support maybe lost, patch support maybe delayed. I'm sure there is a discord or reddit for you to attempt to defend Epic also, but here you are

Lol screw the devs right for putting their game on a platform that gives a better cut towards them (two guys btw not a big dev team who have lives and need money) while also getting upfront cash when we all know money is needed. Of course lets speculate that the game is trash and thats why they took the deal rather than idk literally any other reason. You're literally just telling a just-so story lmao

[Bankai9212]

Originally posted by 【ローズ】:

Originally posted by Wrinkly:

Wrong game? How can you suggest a better game without mentioning another game? Yes, I mentioned the Salt and Sanctuary not being on Steam, due to not being as good as the first therefore taking Epic's exclusivity cash, and then mentioned the threads where people who were silly enough to fall for it were reduced to using Steam to discuss it as Epic doesn't allow such discussion. So what?

Not all games perform the same on Epic, e.g. modding support maybe lost, patch support maybe delayed. I'm sure there is a discord or reddit for you to attempt to defend Epic also, but here you are

Lol screw the devs right for putting their game on a platform that gives a better cut towards them (two guys btw not a big dev team who have lives and need money) while also getting upfront cash when we all know money is needed. Of course lets speculate that the game is trash and thats why they took the deal rather than idk literally any other reason. You're literally just telling a just-so story lmao

The game could have been sold on both and made a good amount of sales, the cut is irrelevant, plus there are examples of games that did take it and it wasn’t that good. Reality what devs do or what they make isn’t really the consumers problem.

[^_^]

Originally posted by Bankai9212:

Originally posted by 【ローズ】:

Lol screw the devs right for putting their game on a platform that gives a better cut towards them (two guys btw not a big dev team who have lives and need money) while also getting upfront cash when we all know money is needed. Of course lets speculate that the game is trash and thats why they took the deal rather than idk literally any other reason. You're literally just telling a just-so story lmao

The game could have been sold on both and made a good amount of sales, the cut is irrelevant, plus there are examples of games that did take it and it wasn’t that good. Reality what devs do or what they make isn’t really the consumers problem.

Let me know when you know the devs financial situation instead of just-so stories.