Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
it is absurdly difficult to perceive its distance relative to yourself because 95% of the surroundings are sky
i didnt recall fov was in the options
my computer can definitely handle a higher fov so i should try that
part before star haven village with three grapple and boost is just infernall, abysmal and should be obliterated with nuclear weapon
i hope there will be opportunity to slaughter all citizens and burn their corpses just for living in that place
you had to find a path forward and use actual functioning platforming mechanics (i.e. not grappling)
that was fun
the unthinking/luck-based platforming that is grappling is just onerous segments in between enjoyable parts of the game
I don't think it is luck-based at all. I just beat the game and didn't die too many times in the infamous ice cave level. I is not that hard when you improve your depth perception and reflexes. As HubHikari said, the ideal FOV for this game is around 100-110. The more you are able to see the better!
Also, try to avoid bumping into the flying rocks you grapple on. Losing momentum means certain death most of the time. But that makes sense, doesn't it? You will have to release at just the right moment to maintain a good amount of speed. That is the most important thing to learn in this game, otherwise your experience will be insanely frustrating. Also, use WASD in the air, too. It's easy to forget you have aircontrol in this game, because the last games that used this mechanic were released about 10 years ago...
Mention not the name of the beast!
No, but Steak's got it right. Bump your FOV (I personally can't play PC games with an FOV less than 100 nowadays; DXHR and Skyrim spoiled me), don't smack into the rocks (Try to grapple the side of the rock and sling yourself past it as you go. This will greatly help when rocks are rather distant from each other) and remember to use your WSAD in the air. You don't have a super great deal of control (i.e. you can't very well dial back your speed if you're overshooting [this is the primary source of frustration I had with Maddie's challenge]), but it's usually enough. If possible, also do conserve a grapple charge; that way, you can grapple the platform and pull yourself to it.
and yeah i know you can move in the air unless you did the run'n jump thing
and i know how much that breaks physics but again: i dont care about how bad the physics are as long as i can acclimate myself to the engine (which i have/did)
^^
What makes you think the physics are bad? These are not earth-physics. These are flying-rock-dimension-physics. Of course they are not easy to get used to. But if you are willing to learn a complex game mechanic, you can have a huge amount of fun with it.
i should really clarify: it isnt that the physics are necessarily bad or poorly implemented because i guess they are neither
i found myself able to become accustomed/acclimated to them fairly quickly
what i really mean is the physics are super unrealistic
even someone whose sole physics education is a high school course knows this game breaks conservation of momentum
and that is just the starting point
that is a super good point
i think given this discussion something needs to be done about the fov option in the game
either the default needs to be upped or some sort of in-game documentation added
In-game documentation would honestly be a little redundant. FIeld-of-view is an established, well-understood concept. It refers to the maximum horizontal angle you can see; the higher the FOV, the more you can see around you.
it is typically understood as an aesthetic option
Being able to see more is an advantage, objectively. That means having a higher FOV improves gameplay, while a lower FOV will always be a handicap.
FOV has nothing to do with aesthetics. Maybe, if we were talking about horror games, a lower FOV could add to the claustrophobic feel as it does in Dead Space, for example. But that doesn't change the fact that it hinders your ability to see your surroundings (and enemies), therefore having a huge effect on your gameplay experience.
A higher FOV allows you to see stuff earlier, without even having to move your mouse. That becomes especially important in competitive games, where being able to see your enemies sooner will greatly increase your chances of survival.
Higher is better. Always was, always will be. Calling FOV an "aesthetic choice" is like saying "we chose 30FPS to make our game more 'cinematic' because 60 looks fake". That's utter nonsense. Please don't listen to whoever said that.
I feel like swinging would've been more fun and less cumbersome. But I guess this grapple is cool for what it is.