GTA V capped at 60fps?

[MellowMange]

Am I the only one that is a bit worried that the game is limitied to max 60fps?
I mean, why make so much noise about how the game supports 60fps when they could simply say Unlimited//Uncapped fps experience for PC players.

What do you guys think?

[TOE FOO]

TKFF lähetti viestin:

You won't notice the difference between 60 fps and 26137247546 fps.

ttbh you do notice the difference between 60 and 75fps , but it is in rare occasions... for example if u are willing to test, download cabal online eu/na whatever region youre at... and try the game at 60fps and 75 and above... you will see it, because its single threaded game :)

[v8vaantage]

Era lähetti viestin:

Why have more then 30 fps? srsly...

As the saying goes, "if you haven't experienced it you don't miss it".

After seeing and playing games at 60 and above, it's very uncomfortable and jarring to go back and play something that runs slower. Think of it as trading in your 3.0l engined car and replacing it for a 1.2l engined car. That for me somes up the 30 vs 60 argument.

60FPS is the magic figure which gamers look for, hence why it's quoted all the time (A bit like the 1080p magic number for PS4/XB1 games) It isn't locked, but that is what the PC version is DESIGNED to run at, as the animations are created for that; like most games. If you want the fps unlocked or the refresh rate higher, adjust the refresh rate or turn off V-sync.

[Wu]

Why Read This? lähetti viestin:

I'm so glad I will be able to play it in 4K with my GTX 980 4GB

At 35 - 45 FPS, sure. With a single GTX 980, I don't see you getting a constant 60 FPS at 4K.

[Amiga500]

Andrius227 lähetti viestin:

Why Read This? lähetti viestin:

Then your complete setup must lack. I have no problems playing in 4K what so ever.

My setup is a beast (i7-5930k, 16gb ddr4). But i do play quite demanding games. For example today i played The Witcher 2, all maxed except ubersampling. Getting anywhere from 50 to 100 fps, on 1440p. And it's quite an old game now too. Can't imagine playing 4k, framerate would be halved most likely.

And gta V is even more demanding that Witcher 2, much more i would say.

We seem to have a smiliar setup?
I bought this PC just for GTA V 5 months ago - and I am aiming to get 80-100 frames on ULTRA settings at 1440p. I will get mad if this would not be enough.

My system:
ASUS ROG Swift 27" PG278Q, 144Hz, 2560*1440p, G-Sync;
Intel i7-5930K @ 4,30 GHz overclocked;
2* EVGA GeForce GTX 970 FTW ACX 2.0 via SLI;
SSD Samsung 850 Pro 512GB; 16 GB DDR4 G-Skill PC2666 CL15

Don't tell me this game will be capped at 60 frames!

[Andrius227]

Why Read This? lähetti viestin:

Andrius227 lähetti viestin:

My setup is a beast (i7-5930k, 16gb ddr4). But i do play quite demanding games. For example today i played The Witcher 2, all maxed except ubersampling. Getting anywhere from 50 to 100 fps, on 1440p. And it's quite an old game now too. Can't imagine playing 4k, framerate would be halved most likely.

And gta V is even more demanding that Witcher 2, much more i would say.

Strange, as I have that CPU overclocking to 4.7Ghz with liquid cooling, and 32GB DDR4, my 980 OC by around 9-10%, and yet, again, I repeat, I have no problems with 4K gaming

Do you even play on 60+ fps ? And what games ? Don't think it's anything demanding.

[Ebalink2]

There are so many people talking about how they can´t play a game under 60 fps.
My pc as the same power as a potato and i play bf4 with the graphics on low at 20 fps and it´s fine by me, I still enjoy the game

[Andrius227]

Why Read This? lähetti viestin:

Andrius227 lähetti viestin:

Do you even play on 60+ fps ? And what games ? Don't think it's anything demanding.

I don't understand why this is so hard for you to believe. Are you just jealous that my PC can play games better than yours?

I figure it is because I didn't state my dual 980's because I only said "on my 980" - if that is the case, fair enough. But if not, what is it you do not understand?

Oh yeah you are on sli 980s, that explains it. I knew 4k was not possible on a single 980, unless you play something very old or not graphically demanding.

I myself plan to get either a second 980 or wait a bit till 980 ti comes out and get 2 of those, because a single 980 is nowhere near enough for my current 1440p monitor (144hz).

[Kite]

ebalink2 lähetti viestin:

There are so many people talking about how they can´t play a game under 60 fps.
My pc as the same power as a potato and i play bf4 with the graphics on low at 20 fps and it´s fine by me, I still enjoy the game

When you get used to high frame rate it's really hard to go back. I can deal with 45-60 fps now because I now have G-Sync monitor, before it had to be 60fps. 60fps+ is a treat.

[Era]

Notice i said rendered correctly

[TOE FOO]

ebalink2 lähetti viestin:

There are so many people talking about how they can´t play a game under 60 fps.
My pc as the same power as a potato and i play bf4 with the graphics on low at 20 fps and it´s fine by me, I still enjoy the game

yah, like someone posted , if you havent tried m u dont miss it...
but to me .. 60fps is a MUST. anything below to me is like watching picture slideshow :)

[Arma Roleplayer]

It will 100% be locked at 60fps.

Not the first time Rockstar has locked a game and it won't be the last. You guys should be thankful Rockstar even spent all the time re-doing facial animations and the like to suit 60fps.
Rockstar uses a complex facial capture to sync lips to words in all their new games. And it looks great but the downside is it is sync'd to a frame-rate. Remember the 30fps lock on LA: Noire? Exactly this. You guys are lucky they spent all the time re capturing stuff to run at 60. Not to mention physics are all wrong at higher frame-rates too. No doubt they re-did that too for a variable frame-rate.

Get off your elistist high horses and respect the ammount of time and effort that companies put into games for you. Or you know, we could go back to poor, terribly off lip syncing if thats what you want.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbOSP7wb5DU - LA:Noire bugs at 60fps.

It's not like Rockstar is like: "Hey lets screw over PC gamers!!!! HAHA!" It literally has to be this way. That's the price you pay when you give extreme visual detail to things that other games put aside.

[BridgetFisher]

Filia lähetti viestin:

Murderpop lähetti viestin:

Everyone can notice the difference between 30, 60 and 120 fps. If you say one can't, then you probably haven't compared directly.

I hope the game isn't capped at 60, for I play on 120. 120 is so much better and I personally can't think of any reasons why devs do cap their games' fps on PC.

Yeah, but the frameskipping that 120 FPS produce are unbareable!

120 fps everyone knows is the only way to view smooth gameplay, its how the human eye works.

[MellowMange]

Constantine lähetti viestin:

It will 100% be locked at 60fps.

Not the first time Rockstar has locked a game and it won't be the last. You guys should be thankful Rockstar even spent all the time re-doing facial animations and the like to suit 60fps.
Rockstar uses a complex facial capture to sync lips to words in all their new games. And it looks great but the downside is it is sync'd to a frame-rate. Remember the 30fps lock on LA: Noire? Exactly this. You guys are lucky they spent all the time re capturing stuff to run at 60. Not to mention physics are all wrong at higher frame-rates too. No doubt they re-did that too for a variable frame-rate.

Get off your elistist high horses and respect the ammount of time and effort that companies put into games for you. Or you know, we could go back to poor, terribly off lip syncing if thats what you want.

The problem is not that it will be capped, the problem is that Rockstar is not honest about it from the start.

If they would just say exactly what you said some people may forgive them, but now it will be a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ when the game releases instead, but that doesn't matter for Rockstar since they already got the money.

[Filia (｡◔‿↼｡)]

Andrius227 lähetti viestin:

Why Read This? lähetti viestin:

I don't understand why this is so hard for you to believe. Are you just jealous that my PC can play games better than yours?

I figure it is because I didn't state my dual 980's because I only said "on my 980" - if that is the case, fair enough. But if not, what is it you do not understand?

Oh yeah you are on sli 980s, that explains it. I knew 4k was not possible on a single 980, unless you play something very old or not graphically demanding.

I myself plan to get either a second 980 or wait a bit till 980 ti comes out and get 2 of those, because a single 980 is nowhere near enough for my current 1440p monitor (144hz).

Obviously not, but it should be, for the price/quality, it is very expensive to be an excelent 1080p card but a regular 4k card.

My GTX 650 TI BOOST runs everything at 1080p High/Ultra without problems 50/60 FPS, and at Digital 4k High/Ultra 13 FPS average.

It is a really accessible graphic card right now and it runs everything really smooth.

[icelite]

Era lähetti viestin:

Neckbeard #Fleek lähetti viestin:

30FPS is unbearable to a PC gamer.

That's just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ if its rendered correctly you can't even notice the difference between 30 and 60 fps

LOL! Just go to youtube and watch a 30 FPS vs. a 60 FPS video, then you can continue to spew stuff out of your ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.