安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Nope, you are right. Price/Performance the GTX 970 is the best GPU atm. GTX 980 only get 5-12FPS more in most newer AAA games, that GPU cost €200 more than the GTX 970.
On 1080P the GTX 970 use 4GB VRAM perfectly fine without problems (i did several tests)
For the future ? GTX 960 is a midrange GPU and is even a bit slower than the GTX 770. And GTX 960 has a 128Bit Bus. Imho the GTX 960 is not worth it and i didn't saw a lot of people using that GPU in my Megathread (1.500 posts) or in the can i run it thread (6.000+ posts). Most people just save up some money for the GTX 970.
the i5 just cost 100 more...
Yes, but comparatively AMD's top CPU is still a lot less expensive than Intel's top CPU and, in gaming, does well enough to not be too big an influence on performance
intel mid cpu is better than amd top cpu if OCed and even with standard clock in most games
Also, if you are planning on going with a Radeon video card, go with an AMD processor. They play nicer together for some reason. You mentioned the R7 260x....don't even bother. It doesn't have the architecture required to run Mantle, and won't likely be DX12 compatible. Go R9 280 or better to ensure forwards compatibility for quite a while.
AMD is cheaper, lets you get more power on a budget to put into a better video card, more and faster ram, and all around makes a good reasonably priced system.
Having said all that, if money is no object, go Intel. At least until we find out just how much of an advantage the extra cores give with DX12 and Mantle.
Regardless, there's hardly any difference in what the end-user would feel. That crap tends to come through on the synthetic benchmarks
I know that, clock for clock, Intel bests AMD. Still doesn't change that most people aren't going to notice a difference between a OC'd 8350 + GPU and a i5-4690k + (same) GPU unless they used a lot of applications that do real well on higher IPCs
Well, they're a lot of ♥♥♥♥ (comparatively) cores.. Intel i7's are still probably going to pull ahead.
1600MHz is enough.