Do You Consider This A True Successor To GTA San Andreas?

[AlphaZeroX96]

So after people were disappointed with GTA 4 during its release, would you say that GTA 5 is the true sequel to SA?

[UrbanFreakOut]

shut up

[Tuuka]

GTA 4 was the most underrated in the series, i would not say people were disappointed with it, overall it was a great game. Hard to say for some it is a successor for some it isnt, for me it is not

[AlphaZeroX96]

Originally posted by UrbanFreakOut:

shut up

All I did was ask if GTA 5's the true successor or not.

[Hulkachan]

Nope, GTA SA is still the best GTA game.

[Blink]

4 was and 5

[Kain]

Originally posted by Tuuka:

GTA 4 was the most underrated in the series, i would not say people were disappointed with it, overall it was a great game. Hard to say for some it is a successor for some it isnt, for me it is not

Underrated? People cant seem to shut up about how its "so much better than V". In the end every GTA has something going for it and everyone has their own favorite one. I dont remember anyone being disappointed besides the PC players, for how horribly optimized it was and still is.

[AlphaZeroX96]

Originally posted by 🎆💎Hulka HGZ 💎🎆:

Nope, GTA SA is still the best GTA game.

You're not wrong there, pal.

[Hulkachan]

Originally posted by AlphaZeroX96:

Originally posted by 🎆💎Hulka HGZ 💎🎆:

Nope, GTA SA is still the best GTA game.

You're not wrong there, pal.

I fear GTA 6 will be yet another pretty box with nothing in it. Cant tell when last i even played gta online. Video games these days are less about fun and interaction and more about how they can milk every dime from the customer while offering as little as possible.

[Heck]

Same city
GTA4 is based off New York

SA/5 are LA

[Chrome]

♥♥♥♥ no this isn't a successor to SA. San Fierro and Las Venturas are missing, instead we got left with Blaine County, ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. They forgot the Families came back and were king in Los Santos in the end, now we're forced to believe the Ballas and Vagos are still so big?

I don't think they gave a ♥♥♥♥ about SA when making V, they just wanted to use LS to raise clout like with Liberty City, except this time they dropped the ball because they were too lazy to bring back the rest.

[Soloplayer901]

Originally posted by AlphaZeroX96:

Originally posted by UrbanFreakOut:

shut up

All I did was ask if GTA 5's the true successor or not.

Shut up

[Joe Cool]

GTA V isn't anywhere near as good as San Andreas.

Now if they had released 3 DLC's that added San Fiero, Las Venturas, and more countryside/desert to the map, then it could had a chance at being a true successor.

But at this point, even GTA IV is better than GTA V.

[Hulkachan]

Originally posted by Joe Cool:

GTA V isn't anywhere near as good as San Andreas.

Now if they had released 3 DLC's that added San Fiero, Las Venturas, and more countryside/desert to the map, then it could had a chance at being a true successor.

But at this point, even GTA IV is better than GTA V.

facts

[psi onix]

i already played way too much GTA 3 by the time Vice City & San Andreas came out so they were kind of boring to me and i couldn't get into them.

To me GTA V is unique in the franchise and not really a successor to anything but in it's own category. GTA Online especially is unmatched in gaming history hence it still continues to be so popular between both FiveM & the vanilla.

[Gogoris]

GTAV does not feel as impressive or cool as San Andreas because it doesn't have the 1990s theme. The music, cars, fashion, it's all stuck and stylized a certain way, inspired by movies and tv shows.

GTAV feels like a direct sequel to GTAIV. Nothing really changed, it was just slightly current era at the time. GTA6 looks like an even more direct sequel to V. So really, just boring again. I think the older games just had a bit more uniqueness to them because of the different time periods, even GTA2 having a made up western/american city.