Rockstar why casino is banned on Peru, gambling is allowed here in whole country.

[Cir0x]

¿?

[[-iD-]]

is online gambling allowed?

[Cir0x]

-iD-님이 먼저 게시:

is online gambling allowed?

yes, there is other games like the famous pokerstars online, where people play online with real cash and no game cash like gta v.

the only thing that rockstar need to do is to get a free online license from perú.

[[-iD-]]

Cir0x님이 먼저 게시:

the only thing that rockstar need to do is to get a free online license from perú.

oh, see that would cost resources and rockstar is in the habit of not spending resources.
so you are looking at either a long wait or just not going to happen.

[Cir0x]

-iD-님이 먼저 게시:

Cir0x님이 먼저 게시:

the only thing that rockstar need to do is to get a free online license from perú.

oh, see that would cost resources and rockstar is in the habit of not spending resources.
so you are looking at either a long wait or just not going to happen.

is a free license.

[[-iD-]]

Cir0x님이 먼저 게시:

-iD-님이 먼저 게시:

oh, see that would cost resources and rockstar is in the habit of not spending resources.
so you are looking at either a long wait or just not going to happen.

is a free license.

i didn't say money. some one would have to fill out a form you see...

[Brian9824]

Cir0x님이 먼저 게시:

-iD-님이 먼저 게시:

oh, see that would cost resources and rockstar is in the habit of not spending resources.
so you are looking at either a long wait or just not going to happen.

is a free license.

Even if the license is free their are usually regulations you have to abide by, reporting that has to be done, etc.

Besides this is a new feature so perhaps they will get a license later and offer it, just not in the first iteration.

[Skakk]

If they apply for a licence, then they are accepting that they have gambling.
If they accept gambling then they cant argue against it in other countries.
Soon The EU will ban loot boxes and Micro/Macro transactions if the game companies don't heavily regulate there use, for example showing you the odds of getting what you want from a loot box.
Also children will not be allowed to access these type of games. Also they will leave themselves open for court liability in cases were gamblers and individuals have large amounts of cash extorted from them.

Not as simple to just apply for a licence, which would also cost them to hire a legal team to do so in each country.

[Cir0x]

brian9824님이 먼저 게시:

Cir0x님이 먼저 게시:

is a free license.

Even if the license is free their are usually regulations you have to abide by, reporting that has to be done, etc.

Besides this is a new feature so perhaps they will get a license later and offer it, just not in the first iteration.

let hope that rockstar will get the license from peru later.

[[-iD-]]

i was actually going to say what MajorSkakker said but didn't want to type all that.

[frisky777]

youre not missing out on anything the whole casino is rigged to death

[qrees1]

Surprise mechanics ****** *******

[BlazeD]

Cir0x, are you a Peruvian lawyer?

R* consulted with actual lawyers with regards to your countries laws to determine if they could market this update there, legally. If you got some insight, contact them.

[Brian9824]

MajorSkakker님이 먼저 게시:

If they apply for a licence, then they are accepting that they have gambling.
If they accept gambling then they cant argue against it in other countries.
Soon The EU will ban loot boxes and Micro/Macro transactions if the game companies don't heavily regulate there use, for example showing you the odds of getting what you want from a loot box.
Also children will not be allowed to access these type of games. Also they will leave themselves open for court liability in cases were gamblers and individuals have large amounts of cash extorted from them.

Not as simple to just apply for a licence, which would also cost them to hire a legal team to do so in each country.

That's not really true. Since each country has different views on what gambling is you can easily say by xxx law this is gambling, by US law it would not be. Admitting that its gambling by Peru law, doesn't make it gambling by US law.

If challenged in court the only point of contention is how your content meets the standards of gambling based on THAT countries law. Otherwise the fact that its not considered gambling in most countries would come into play after all.

In fact by UK law its explicitly not gambling

[Cir0x]

brian9824님이 먼저 게시:

MajorSkakker님이 먼저 게시:

If they apply for a licence, then they are accepting that they have gambling.
If they accept gambling then they cant argue against it in other countries.
Soon The EU will ban loot boxes and Micro/Macro transactions if the game companies don't heavily regulate there use, for example showing you the odds of getting what you want from a loot box.
Also children will not be allowed to access these type of games. Also they will leave themselves open for court liability in cases were gamblers and individuals have large amounts of cash extorted from them.

Not as simple to just apply for a licence, which would also cost them to hire a legal team to do so in each country.

That's not really true. Since each country has different views on what gambling is you can easily say by xxx law this is gambling, by US law it would not be. Admitting that its gambling by Peru law, doesn't make it gambling by US law.

If challenged in court the only point of contention is how your content meets the standards of gambling based on THAT countries law. Otherwise the fact that its not considered gambling in most countries would come into play after all.

In fact by UK law its explicitly not gambling

Well, in peru, there is a lot of gambling casinos with different kind of games insides, so they are very allowed here at peru.

[Brian9824]

Cir0x님이 먼저 게시:

brian9824님이 먼저 게시:

That's not really true. Since each country has different views on what gambling is you can easily say by xxx law this is gambling, by US law it would not be. Admitting that its gambling by Peru law, doesn't make it gambling by US law.

If challenged in court the only point of contention is how your content meets the standards of gambling based on THAT countries law. Otherwise the fact that its not considered gambling in most countries would come into play after all.

In fact by UK law its explicitly not gambling

Well, in peru, there is a lot of gambling casinos with different kind of games insides, so they are very allowed here at peru.

Yeah, in the US it would not considered gambling anymore then the free poker and casino apps you can download on your phone are. It's not regulated because of the inability to cash out.

In Peru it might very well be considered gambling based on their interpretation. The two have no correlation though. If it went to trial in the US they aren't going to use the Peru example as the laws regarding it are totally different and don't apply.