安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The i5 6500 *is* enough. It doesn't bottleneck any video card out right now.
Even a Sandy-Bridge i5 won't bottleneck an 1080.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKOG_inHmaA Here's some proof to go along with that bold statement. It's of a GTX 1070, but it should be close enough.
EDIT: It's worth noting that the i5 2500k is overclocked to 4.2GHz, it's not much of an overclock though.
did you even look at the settings they reccomend or try any out
After you've done that, and kept all the changes I've asked you to make previously, you'll be playing on the same settings I play on. I play at 1440p on those settings, but with 1.25x Frame Scaling Mode instead of 1.5x.
I know for a fact that you should never drop below 60fps with those settings, unless something is wrong with your computer, or you're not telling the whole truth about your video settings...intentional or not.
I added you to help you further, and in real time.
First of all, you can run GTA V on Very High with 60fps as oposed to what? Also, what resolution?
Secondly, if it's the CPU why was it fine when they had a GTX 980?
Try reading the whole thread, everyone has been through this. I've posted several times proving with video evidence that the GPU is not being bottlenecked. I've even linked a video where a i5 2500K isn't bottlenecking a GTX 1070.
Yes, you will get better fps and be able to play on higher settings with the same fps if you overclock your CPU or upgrade it to a better model...that's common sense. However, that doesn't make the root of this problem, the CPU not being powerful enough, nor bottlenecking the GPU.
FYI, I know you're lying. It's painfully obvious. I've already linked a i5 6600k vs i7 6700k comparison for GTA V in this thread. There's no difference in FPS.
Seeing as the i5-4440 is just an i7-4790 without hyper-threading, 2MB less cache, and 0.5-0.7GHz slower, there's no way upgrading to an i7 4790 would have made much of a difference for you in GTA V unless your CPU was dying. At best, you gained 5-8fps, which is around the "margin of error" territory.
EDIT: The differences between processors listed above are the same for the i5 6660k and i7 6700k. Give or take 0.1GHz.
Thanks for being another "too lazy to read or do research", lying, and thread derailing, stereotypical Steam forum "helper".
You totally couldn't be lying about buying the i7-4790, or lying about having the i5-4440 in the first place. *SARCASM*
Those are two different i7's from two different generations of Intel Processors. It's not a fair comparison, nor does it apply here.
Keep arguing with me without providing any evidence and ignoring most of my points/arguments, though. You'll totally win and be right by doing that! *SARCASM*