Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Only for the Fleischer article, which the video says didn't call the game racist: https://unwinnable.com/2017/11/10/cuphead-and-the-racist-spectre-of-fleischer-animation/
Clearly the guy who made the video didn't actually read it. People are just defending it by saying that the phrase "Cuphead is racist" doesn't appear, even though it complains that the game is "whitewashing" history and ignoring important pieces of it. There's many quotes to be made from this article where it essentially says that many movies and video games are really bad in this sense.
It's not directly saying "racism," but it is doing so indirectly, by arguing that the game is trying to favor the history of white people and act like racism didn't exist or shouldn't be associated with that art style or time period anymore. It's a weird argument for the article if you actually go and read the whole thing.
>sucks as F
>uploads video
>youtubers ranted on the silliness of the uploader
>plays the game themselves
>sell in millions in just 2 weeks
more like people just took the bait. and they took it hook, line and sinker. though I doubt the devs deliberately told dean to play the game in such an awful way.
Alternatively, it was a case similar to gen 4 MLP where certain "news" sites did such a godawful job of tackling the product that people either figured they'd be better off checking it out themselves instead of relying on the reports, or that they'd get an entertaining trainwreck out of it and ended up unironically enjoying it enough that they spread knowledge of it like wildfire.
Incidentally, I only use that example because of the similarities and the fact that that's the only example that comes to mind at the moment.
Why does the internet ruin everything...
Because not taking a side is clearly the same as taking the side of the people you don't like these days.