安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
When you set somebody to overwatch, you're committing that unit to a specific reaction during the enemy turn. If the enemy doesn't move and you don't have covering fire, you just blew an entire action for nothing. If you're going to miss a shot, at least miss it on your own terms after taking a clear %-to-hit shot. Or if you don't want to waste a grenade from your grenadier, use Suppressing Fire, because grenadiers can't hit ANYTHING with their default cannons.
Multiply your base chance-to-hit by x0.7 for overwatch, or x0.6 against a dash
I always try and use it to set up first or second turn ambush most of the time i have a least 1-2 kills using a 4-6 man team. I normally use the leap frog approach
Send half your squad to scout out whilst the other half is in over watch if the advancing team spot's an enemy the most likely result will be the enemy's bloody free move then hopefully my over watch team will pin down or kill a few.
Then rinse and repeat. i always like keeping at least 1-2 over watch shoots up my sleeve even if they always the best percentage you never know at time just whom is going to pop out of the wood work. But thanks to the timer you some times just have to "run and gun"
lol
The engine has been verified to be fair in two ways:
1. Statistical analysis with large samples, not your whinging.
2. Decompilation of the code to determin the PRNG system which is a common, fair and widely accepted as fair system.
And you suffer from the Gambler's fallacy and an apparent unawareness of what random actually looks like.
No, it's not a strawman. You obviously don't know what a strawman is. He's saying YOU DO NOT HAVE AN ARGUEMNT but are lashing out while SUFFERING FROM A LOGICAL FALLACY KNOWNS AS GAMBLER'S FALLACY. A strawman argument is this:
Also, you also don't know the difference between odds and probablilities.
AND you sure as eff don't know that there are two penalties on over-watch dashing. I don't know what they are in XCOM2, but in XCOM EU it worked like this:
Anyway, you're far out of your league in this issue you should shut up and stop embarassing yourself.
I've seen those numbers. I believe they're right. THough the wiki I use hasn't updated them.
In XCOM EU, as I illustrated in a previous post, they were .7 & .7.