Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This game needs some work before it can really be considered a "strategy" game.
That is actually very impressive.
Games should be purchased just like vehicles. After the first or second revision.
I remember how mad people used to get at Nintendo back in the 90s and early 00s for delaying a game two or three times. But how many first party Nintendo games were glitchy, unplayable messes? Zero.
The problem is line of sight. You might be able to shoot through a wall with a powerful rifle but if you can't see your target you're not going to hit. But in this game the enemies can see you through walls unexpectedly and you might not be able to do the same. It's a bit game breaking. And it makes ironman basically impossible. (I would assume; I haven't tried because I have no interest in losing the game because of poorly designed mechanics)