Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Actually since I've been watching his series since XCOM EU then yes, I've probably seen a few hundred.
Here's the deal.
I think he is a great player and I enjoy his videos immensely. I also don't think he blatantly cheats on every mission because I have seen him fail missions and roll with it.
However, all the XCOM runs I've played I usually lose a soldier or two per campaign to complete utter BS shots (edge case RNG). I've seen this happen to plenty of other streamers especially back in XCOM EU Impossible.
ChristopherOdd? Nope. He never seems to lose a soldier or have a mission go so bad that he has a few MIA.
Like I said, he is either VERY lucky or there is more to this than meets the eye.
There is also the fact he likes to 'roleplay' the fact he's never done missions before. In his XCOM EW run through he was pretending as if he'd never played the missions before, but I could tell by his soldier placement he knew exactly where to put his guys on some of the EW storyline missions - ie Portent.
Unrelated though Legendary in XCOM2 does become easier after a while that the difficulty would insinuate, because I've noticed you get so many resources and Elerium cores that you can get ahead of the game. More so than commander/vet.
I agree, but consistantly? The very nature of XCOM is no matter how well you play you can only mitigate risk, not remove it. Anyway I am on the fence about it and I have had insanely lucky missions, such as my last one where I had to take mainly rookies and they hit eveything, most at maximum damage. What I had thought was a guaranteed lose mission turned things round to a great sucess. If I saw a Youtuber do the same I would be very suspicious.
Items such as mimic beacons also used to trivialise content sometimes. But thankfully that has been fixed.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=645284955
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=645285062
You probably have mate, but the end game stats don't record making a copy of the save pre-mission, playing out the mission and then copying the save back and using the information you gained to rofl stomp the mission. If you fail rinse and repeat.
Or just use alt-f4.
There is no real way to definitively prove anything in xcom, short of a full twitch stream with analysis of the end game stats to ensure no silly-buggers have taken place.
Wish firaxis added an official mod which made the ironman save apply each action, and that the game files were verified.
ANyway kudos on your achievment, I have no cuase to doubt you. Just pointing out that the stats don't reallt prove anything, (re: cheating), thats all.
Are they cheating? I have no idea but considering athletes cheat so much with steroids I think it is possible.
You can manually backup your save in your save game folder and paste as many times as you want until you win the mission. Backup your save each time you start mission, if something go wrong you can just paste that save file and re-try
Just saying. Those mod you mention still mean nothing and nothing can prove anything either.
Ironman or not, I trust no one but myself.
While cheating does exist - you tubers have the added advantage of actually seeing them play.
While I'll agree he's lucky, that isn't nearly enough to prove he's cheating.
Take a look at this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkWCiK4Ejzc
Highlights include an Advent soldier crit'ing his covered Specialist in an elevated postion (from what must have been a ~40% to hit shot), his Sniper missing an 80+% Lightning Hands shot followed by a 90+% sniper shot, his sloppy advancing triggering two pods at once before even seeing the objective, and a turret randomly deciding his almost-dead and mission-critical specialist was not a good enough target.
He countered each and every situation with decent tactics thinking through his options beforehand. It's not cheating. It's pragmatic play. That's why I tend to watch his videos - he's not in the same league as Beaglerush but his approach is much easier to take useful info from.
He *might* be cheating, but the simple fact that he isn't losing people is not evidence of that.
this is the best épisode, i saw, from XCOM (all "seasons" counted), LIKE A REAL MOVIE IN A CINEMA :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPeUd1IyLLM&t=2487s
ps: even if he put this video, only 3 days ago, he recorded that a very long time before, that explains that the game had a little changed, since.
Yeah, go do that in the first few missions when you have just four guys and just one utility slot per guy, and no special armors that hand you heavy weapons. So how that works out for you. Do you hook up a microphone, and tell the game, "Now game, don't let my game depend on dice rolls; always make sure I can get 100% shots, regardless of dstance or type of weapon, and always restock my grenades so I can keep using them." and then magically it happens?
Oh, yes; "Game, make sure there's always an available backup plan."
And what about before it?
Oh, yeah, tell people the bleeding obvious. Say, is there also a command to the game into the microphone, "Now game, make sure no pods patrol into me when I'm busy with another pod; and make sure I never just on the edge that by the look of things couldn't really activate another pod, activates another pod. Thank you, game."
How the ♥♥♥♥ do you think you get 80%+ shots? This kind of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ makes me think you don't actually play the game.
You mean, YOU get reaction shots; not that helps any if you miss every overwatch shot.
Oh, look, the bleeding obvious. We never figured out those things, because we're just stupid. Again, it's almost like you parrot what you see youtubers do, who by RNG luck are successful, and you don't actually play the game.
He says, while we're talking about missing multiple 80%+ shots in a row.
Yesah, like we don't. But that's the very point isn't it; you're talking about this being an occasional occurance, and this because they don't get ♥♥♥♥♥♥ over by RNG one after another. But what if you get ♥♥♥♥♥♥ over again and again, and agian, that's three grenades gone; a couple of cover destruction; and you're out of greandes, ain't ya? And if the bad RNG holds; you're ♥♥♥♥♥♥, ain't ya. You see, I've never seen a YouTuber face so many high chance misses that he's out of his grenades by the third or fourth turn.
Yeah, "sometimes" being the operative word. 10 of them in a single mission, never happens to them. And that's the kind of stuff we're talking about.
And you just proved their cheaters. You see if the RNG ♥♥♥♥♥ you over ten times in a single mission, you're going to be out of potential back up plans, grenades, whatever mid second pod, third at the latest. And then all that's left is shots that matter.
And if you never come across this, there's something wrong.
Why continue watching someone who you are going to complain about... Makes no sense.
Very good. This conversation ended in March. It's highly likely that the people in the thread do not even remember having it. This is like going to a café, and participating in a discussion that's already finished & everyone has already gone home...