Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No, they are speaking German, not English. There are no accents. There are no Spanish accents, there are no French accents, there are no German accents, there are no Sweedish accents, nor are there Russian accetns, any African accents, nor South American accents, and thus also no Asian accents.
Australian english, uk english and american enlgish happen to be the main languages spoken in those countries.
One check on the Spanishe Language if you did so, you would realise those are pure spanishe with local accent based on region. or South America.
So you want somebody speaking Japanese or Japenglish?
Make up your mind :P
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ero4QwW9-Q
It's really simple.
Local, national military forces may speak their own local language, mandarin, tagalog, spanish, whatever.
International military collaborations typically involve soldiers from diverse nationalities, speaking .. you guessed it... accented english.
Take a UN Peacekeeping operation, as an example where there might be US forces in collaboration with UK, italian, local partisan afghani .. if there's a multi-national team, they will pretty much always speak english.
This rule applies in medicine (multidiscipline teams of specialists brought in from around the world), cross-regional business - it's just simple logic: people choose a common language most known by the team members, and communicate in it.
It is .. and I say this without reservation .. ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ STUPID .. to have a team of six soldiers, where one communicates in french, one in german, one in spanish and the other 3 in english.
Stupid.
You'd need a translator in operations, or a multi-lingual handler, or a technology solution like a babel fish or something... Stupid.
These voice performances have been under-delivered .. just kind of dropped in almost as language packs. But it's out of context and has some dramatic missing elements .. if you can choose a flag, there should be some kind of corresponding voice characterisation choices relevant to that flag.
In a game where you can tailor the soldiers down to a fine detail, not unlike an MMO, the voicing is a real gap.
Example, I can get a mexican recruit, Juan Rodriguez, I want to train him up as a Ranger and nickname him "Machete" .. great. But in terms of voicing choice, he can either blurt all his remarks in spanish, or speak with a stereotypical american accent.
I want an emotionless little chinese woman as a sniper, I can tailor her down to a fine detail, except I have to make her sound like Reese Witherspoon in "Legally Blonde 2"
It doesn't need to be parody, it doesn't need to sound stupid.
But having diverse national backgrounds represented in this multinational XCOM force .. for me the lack of choice and diversity in accents is a gap.
The way it's been done is quick & easy without thought, and it spoils some of the customisation options available in the game.
(And to declare it as cost-prohibitive is ridiculous - it just hasn't been an area of focus and I think the game suffers for it)
What I'm asserting is that ideally every flag in the game should have a corresponding set of matching voice options.
I use asian as an example because it's what bugs me the most - it's the most glaring .. there are 40 european options (but they also bug me, because per my earlier post, they should be speaking english for the most part).
India and China alone represent 1/3 of the world's population - if I recruited a soldier from Hong Kong (for example) he could work fine in the team, speak english, I'd just like to hear his national accent to give him further individuality and flavour. (Same for Russian and any other region represented)
Instead of the 50-60 voice options we have now for any given soldier, my preferred logic would be to have something like 3 variations for each national flag (x2 for gender)
You could tailor a team that would feel more diverse and distinct in their regional personalities.
That's all I'm saying - that the logic in how the voicing feature was implemented is half-arsed, and asserting what I'd prefer.
TL;DR-The feature you want costs money, and the pay off would be insignificant. The modding community has done what you asked, then, which is why mods were made as a focus of the game's development.
"It's too expensive"
and
"The modding community did it for free"
I've worked with translators and to a lesser extent voice actors, the "costs too much" doesn't wash.
The simple fact of the matter is that the way soldier voices are implemented does not jibe with logic and is counter-immersive. That's my only point.
I don't really understand why every jack-in-a-beanstalk feels a need to challenge that contention, but it still doesnt change the simple logic of it.
As to the payoff being insignificant, not everybody values the same things (clearly) and it can actually be a sequence of quite subtle design choices that differentiate between a classic game and a missed opportunity.
No, I'm addressing the contention and saying that the contention is nonsense; because there ARE NO FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACCENTS AT ALL! Now, you can then say, well I would like to have ALL those accents; South American accents, African accents, European accents and Asian accents; (and one assumes those accents and North-American and Australian accents for every other bloody language in the game); but to sit there and say "I want to Asian accents, and Asian accents only" when there are no accents at all, is stupid.
... no ♥♥♥♥, what the ♥♥♥♥ is wrong with you ?
(I already outlined in a clear and cogent way, why the current implementation of languages/accents (you really are a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ BTW) is logically & immersively flawed)
... I didn't say that .. what the ♥♥♥♥ is wrong with you ?
(I mention japanese, indian, mexican, african, russian - and remark that the european languages should be re-characterised --- based around a clearly asserted position that in a multinational military team, everyone does and will speak a common language in the field .. ie english)
I've outlined my position really clearly.
Feel free to vocally disagree with it (if you have nothing better to do). But your demented nonsense is just smoke & noise with no value.
Since you're so happy to lavish around the word "stupid" without actually reading any of the persons comments ..... you're a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot. Go away and do something meaningful instead of wasting your time making halfwit comments that have little or nothing to do with a strangers opinion.
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
No kidding. I've described why I think that's a missed opportunity, and how I would prefer it to work. Get a job.
So Lock and Loll... :P
And all the French voices should be, Mon Dieu what is that I am seeing....
And Russians should be like Ivan. I understand (then some Russian curses) commander.