Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
But you don't have to take our word for it, do some research. google some GTX970 reviews (any brand) and more likely than not, part of the review will be benchmarks (comparing performance of GTX970 against other cards
IIRC, GTX970 performs just slightly better than GTX780TI, but with far less power consumption due to maxwell architecture
as for brands, i don't think it really matters, as performance doen't really differ that much (boils down to which brand has better cooling option). I got the Zotac GTX 970 Omega AMP! 4GB and it works great. If i had more budget, i'd gone for the MSI GTX970 gaming 4GB though, but thats just because the MSI card looks cool
I looked at benchmarks and reviews and the consensus does seem to be that the 970 is like a quarter-notch better than a 780TI at a far more reasonable price. I'm wondering more from the perspective of what's sometimes referred to as "butt dyno" in the context of car tuning; benchmarks are one thing, but that doesn't always capture the "feel" of the card's performance. IOW it might benchmark higher but the differences might not be that noticeable during actual gameplay.
I have games that look just as good or better and perform better. That GTX 970 or 980 will help alleviate the increased overhead running recent games because lazy devs didn't care enough to optimize or support multi-gpu and PC centric features.
At least TEW now has 60fps for anyone that can run it @ 60fps and run it without drops and stutter. I could get 60fps too but then the game would look like an N64 game lol. I think I may be putting aside cash for a 970 or sli'd 970's. For the price of one GTX 980 I could get to GTX 970's, overclock and use them in sli for far superior performance than a single GTX 980. That's the way to go I guess with games like Dead Rising 3, Asassins Creed Unity and TEW that drop the ball on performance and are loaded with technical issues the devs likely won't care to ever resolve.
I think GTX 780 is enough to run modern games on high. I don't think you need to upgrade.
I agree, devs are definitely getting lazy. And, the laziness only really affects the PC community. IMO, devs are trying to cater a lot more to the console community and trying to get people to switch to it from PC, which is awful, as PC wins in every category (except price maybe :D). It getting very irritating. Games that have always been my favorite (i.e. COD and Assassin's Creed) are starting to go "downhill" because of things like crazy large textures that most people can't load, which results in these "next-gen" new games looking like COD 1, lol.
Short answer: Yes.
GTX980 User.
When I was buying GTX670 I was expecting it to run for at least 4-5 years. It's still a great card for now.