How can ps3 run this game with 256mb vram?

[Javix]

Hello, I tried the demo and runs like crap. My specs are not high end but at least it should run as ps3 quality taking into account I can run BF4 and RYSE (family share) at 1080p high 30fps-40fps.

My specs:
PHENOM IIX 4 3,0GHZ
6GB RAM
AMD 7850 2GB VRAM.

This is unacceptable and no sign from the devs.

[...]

Consoles are currently superior to PCs because of the cloud power technology.

[Nebulous]

because ♥♥♥♥♥ optimization because garbage devs

[Javix]

Автор сообщения: FairPlay

Consoles are currently superior to PCs because of the cloud power technology.

Consoles don't use cloud, otherwise they were running at 1080p 60fps. On ps4 it runs at 1920x768 while xone 1600x640p at 24fps-30fps.
And ps3 doesn't use cloud and people reject the cloud since they don't like to be always on cause' they buy second-handed games.

[Shellshock]

Bad optimization and of course, the PS3 only runs at 720p, 30 FPS (barely). And don't believe this bull.sh.it with "Cloud Power Technology".

[TMAC Blade]

Автор сообщения: Javier Turok

Hello, I tried the demo and runs like crap. My specs are not high end but at least it should run as ps3 quality taking into account I can run BF4 and RYSE (family share) at 1080p high 30fps-40fps.

My specs:
PHENOM IIX 4 3,0GHZ
6GB RAM
AMD 7850 2GB VRAM.

This is unacceptable and no sign from the devs.

:dddgrenade:

are you sure? im running on a GTX 650 gig
AMD Athlon X2 II 240 2.80
4 gigs of ram
windows 7
all at 60 fps. there has been posts in the past saying this game has overexagerated system requirments and they were right. there was an article that stated that they simulated a dual core processor on a computer rig and they still got 60 fps. im on the demo so that might be the differing factor but seriously i find this quite odd.

[trek554]

Автор сообщения: FairPlay

Consoles are currently superior to PCs because of the cloud power technology.

I can only hope you are trying to be funny.


OP, the PS3 build is a completely different build than the modern console/ PC build.

[Javix]

Автор сообщения: Nicolas

Bad optimization and of course, the PS3 only runs at 720p, 30 FPS (barely). And don't believe this bull.sh.it with "Cloud Power Technology".

The first chapter it runs good, at 1080p maxed out 33fps-40fps, but 2nd and 3rd chapter I get 15fps-20fps on the forest, so it is not playable!

[Javix]

Автор сообщения: TMAC Blade

Автор сообщения: Javier Turok

Hello, I tried the demo and runs like crap. My specs are not high end but at least it should run as ps3 quality taking into account I can run BF4 and RYSE (family share) at 1080p high 30fps-40fps.

My specs:
PHENOM IIX 4 3,0GHZ
6GB RAM
AMD 7850 2GB VRAM.

This is unacceptable and no sign from the devs.

are you sure? im running on a GTX 650 gig
AMD Athlon X2 II 240 2.80
4 gigs of ram
windows 7
all at 60 fps. there has been posts in the past saying this game has overexagerated system requirments and they were right. there was an article that stated that they simulated a dual core processor on a computer rig and they still got 60 fps. im on the demo so that might be the differing factor but seriously i find this quite odd.

What did you do? Black magic? Even people with latest i7 and gtx 980 can't keep up with 60fps.
The first chapter it runs good, at 1080p maxed out 33fps-40fps, but 2nd and 3rd chapter I get 15fps-20fps on the forest, so it is not playable!

[trek554]

Автор сообщения: TMAC Blade

Автор сообщения: Javier Turok

Hello, I tried the demo and runs like crap. My specs are not high end but at least it should run as ps3 quality taking into account I can run BF4 and RYSE (family share) at 1080p high 30fps-40fps.

My specs:
PHENOM IIX 4 3,0GHZ
6GB RAM
AMD 7850 2GB VRAM.

This is unacceptable and no sign from the devs.

:dddgrenade:

are you sure? im running on a GTX 650 gig
AMD Athlon X2 II 240 2.80
4 gigs of ram
windows 7
all at 60 fps. there has been posts in the past saying this game has overexagerated system requirments and they were right. there was an article that stated that they simulated a dual core processor on a computer rig and they still got 60 fps. im on the demo so that might be the differing factor but seriously i find this quite odd.

you are so full of ♥♥♥♥ and flat out a clueless moron. the game is very demanding due to poor optimizations.

even damn 780 cant stay above 60 fps in all parts of this game and your pitiful little 650 stands no chance of staying at 60 fps especially with your wimpy cpu.


the game was not properly optimized to use more than 2 cores but it needs those 2 cores to be insanely fast. your cpu is slower than anything being tested here. http://s30.postimg.org/qm552tobl/http_www_gamegpu_ru_images_stories_Test_GPU_Act.jpg


here even the 650 ti which smokes your card does not even get 30 fps. http://s17.postimg.org/4re50z2hb/http_www_gamegpu_ru_images_stories_Test_GPU_Act.jpg

[TMAC Blade]

Автор сообщения: Javier Turok

Автор сообщения: TMAC Blade

are you sure? im running on a GTX 650 gig
AMD Athlon X2 II 240 2.80
4 gigs of ram
windows 7
all at 60 fps. there has been posts in the past saying this game has overexagerated system requirments and they were right. there was an article that stated that they simulated a dual core processor on a computer rig and they still got 60 fps. im on the demo so that might be the differing factor but seriously i find this quite odd.

What did you do? Black magic? Even people with latest i7 and gtx 980 can't keep up with 60fps.
The first chapter it runs good, at 1080p maxed out 33fps-40fps, but 2nd and 3rd chapter I get 15fps-20fps on the forest, so it is not playable!

i will continue on in the demo and let you know. odds are its poor optimization which the famed resident evil dev doesnt seem to know much abou. sorry dude. i loved resident evil but this performance is a bit of a train wreck if it gets this bad. i will enable the console through launch options and check the fps as a play though console commands

[trek554]

Автор сообщения: Javier Turok

Автор сообщения: TMAC Blade

are you sure? im running on a GTX 650 gig
AMD Athlon X2 II 240 2.80
4 gigs of ram
windows 7
all at 60 fps. there has been posts in the past saying this game has overexagerated system requirments and they were right. there was an article that stated that they simulated a dual core processor on a computer rig and they still got 60 fps. im on the demo so that might be the differing factor but seriously i find this quite odd.

What did you do? Black magic? Even people with latest i7 and gtx 980 can't keep up with 60fps.
The first chapter it runs good, at 1080p maxed out 33fps-40fps, but 2nd and 3rd chapter I get 15fps-20fps on the forest, so it is not playable!

he is a clueless idiot that would struggle to get 30 fps...

[Javix]

There should be an option to use the ps3 build. It doesn't have features like SSAO and others but at least I bet it would be playable https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu0XM1JwREM

I was in the mood to buy that game but guess I won't upgrade ulti december. Any suggestions, is r9 270x 4gb vram good?

[TMAC Blade]

Автор сообщения: trek554

Автор сообщения: TMAC Blade

are you sure? im running on a GTX 650 gig
AMD Athlon X2 II 240 2.80
4 gigs of ram
windows 7
all at 60 fps. there has been posts in the past saying this game has overexagerated system requirments and they were right. there was an article that stated that they simulated a dual core processor on a computer rig and they still got 60 fps. im on the demo so that might be the differing factor but seriously i find this quite odd.

you are so full of ♥♥♥♥ and flat out a clueless moron. the game is very demanding due to poor optimizations.

even damn 780 cant stay above 60 fps in all parts of this game and your pitiful little 650 stands no chance of staying at 60 fps especially with your wimpy cpu.


the game was not properly optimized to use more than 2 cores but it needs those 2 cores to be insanely fast. your cpu is slower than anything being tested here. http://s30.postimg.org/qm552tobl/http_www_gamegpu_ru_images_stories_Test_GPU_Act.jpg


here even the 650 ti which smokes your card does not even get 30 fps. http://s17.postimg.org/4re50z2hb/http_www_gamegpu_ru_images_stories_Test_GPU_Act.jpg

well im currently at the start of the game and its fine. it might change latter on. but like i said there was a simulated test with a dual core CPU and it still ran fine. i will continue on playing and see.

[trek554]

Автор сообщения: TMAC Blade

Автор сообщения: Javier Turok

What did you do? Black magic? Even people with latest i7 and gtx 980 can't keep up with 60fps.
The first chapter it runs good, at 1080p maxed out 33fps-40fps, but 2nd and 3rd chapter I get 15fps-20fps on the forest, so it is not playable!

i will continue on in the demo and let you know. odds are its poor optimization which the famed resident evil dev doesnt seem to know much abou. sorry dude. i loved resident evil but this performance is a bit of a train wreck if it gets this bad. i will enable the console through launch options and check the fps as a play though console commands

lol you have not even checked the framerates and come in here proclaiming 60 fps with that lowly pc of yours. some of us have actually kept of with reviews and tested the name. you on the other hand just pull random crap out of your rear end.

[TMAC Blade]

Автор сообщения: trek554

Автор сообщения: TMAC Blade

are you sure? im running on a GTX 650 gig
AMD Athlon X2 II 240 2.80
4 gigs of ram
windows 7
all at 60 fps. there has been posts in the past saying this game has overexagerated system requirments and they were right. there was an article that stated that they simulated a dual core processor on a computer rig and they still got 60 fps. im on the demo so that might be the differing factor but seriously i find this quite odd.

you are so full of ♥♥♥♥ and flat out a clueless moron. the game is very demanding due to poor optimizations.

even damn 780 cant stay above 60 fps in all parts of this game and your pitiful little 650 stands no chance of staying at 60 fps especially with your wimpy cpu.


the game was not properly optimized to use more than 2 cores but it needs those 2 cores to be insanely fast. your cpu is slower than anything being tested here. http://s30.postimg.org/qm552tobl/http_www_gamegpu_ru_images_stories_Test_GPU_Act.jpg


here even the 650 ti which smokes your card does not even get 30 fps. http://s17.postimg.org/4re50z2hb/http_www_gamegpu_ru_images_stories_Test_GPU_Act.jpg

im also playing on low settings but still it seems fine to me (demo version). i will get back to you on the performance.