Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
1 
Report this post
I sometimes wonder about the colors. I have to agree, they do feel washed out a bit. Its easy to see when you first start racing.
Its doenst work for VR. It has no impact with VR. This trick works only for monitors.
Well Im telling you that it does not work, meaning, I dont care what he says, it doesnt work, take it from my personal experience, for VR that is.
i find it unfortunate that people fling the "can't improve because will alienate existing players" argument around. it's really a lie, has been "THE lie" since at least 2017 .. it is now 2023. the use of dx11 is more than adequate (gamedev here) and the devs could still make the game look WAY better than it already does (textures, meshes, lighting) the major shortcoming is the content and NOT the engine nor graphics library (facts.) for example adding higher resolution textures, texmaps, higher resolution meshes, improved shaders, none of which forces existing users to upgrade, all of the old content could be (and SHOULD BE) retained, thus this sort of improvement would have zero impact on existing VR experience. the only scenario where existing player experience degrades is when those players are forced to use larger textures (more memory), more complex shaders (eating GPU compute), or more complex meshes (more GPU compute) and why would iRacing do that except they want to spend less of our money? -- the physics shouldn't be impacted, because from a game engine perspective "visuals" have nothing to do with "physics".
this is why you see third-party mods able to dramatically improve visuals. iRacing should hire those guys!
that said, we now see gaming PCs with 240hz refresh, graphics cards that run IRacing at 200fps, 64GiB of ram, 24 core CPUs with 32 threads, and at its heart iRacing lags behind current-level technology by 5+ years. it looks "acceptable" it certainly doesn't look "great."
my point? stop flinging the lie. there's no reason the game can't look better than F1, ACC, etc except that iRacing.com(tm) has no financial incentive to do so. side-by-side with ACC or a RL race and it's obvious it looks like a second-rate game, despite looking as good as it does, it doesn't look anywhere near as goods as it _could_.
</rant>
IS DHUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR GRAPHICSDURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR GRAPHICSGRAPHICS DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR GRAPHICSGRAPHICSGRAPHICSGRAPHICS DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
it's been a while I think it's something about looking like a old Nintendo game
this happens with this kind of people every few years are so when Graphics get improved in the industry
That was me for years until last week. It's not pretty, but it's fun to play so far. But I do want to see these graphic improvements they were touting rather sooner than later.
It will be much later... a lot later.... years away.... this is the way with iracing...... years and years. People have thousands in their setups, ability to run high resolution games, and iracing keeps it in the 1980s.