Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Source? Cause I have heard the exact opposite.
Okay, go look at your first comment though. Sounds like you should have said there will be no female character UNTIL post 1.0. It's even on Trello
Fair point, but simply stating that there won't be no female character period is spreading misinformation. It's like a headline where you click the article and turns out the content says the exact opposite. The devs have not said there won't be a female character either, so the correct response would be that the devs are considering implementation of a female character post 1.0, though there is no certainty that it will happen as of right now.
Yah sorry that's just 'cause I don't see the point in quote-boxing the post directly above mine if I'm the first to respond. I expect people to be able to follow along without that but clearly that's not always the case.
This is the post I was replying to:
^That - the quoted post I'm ^pointing to with the little ^up-arrow, is not correct.