Mr. Bree+

Mr. Bree+

View Stats:
Eden May 4, 2014 @ 1:58am
BUYER BEWARE
Buyer beware, whatever you do, do not buy this game.

I'm actually ashamed to have spent money on this, and I hope the devs are ashamed for releasing it in this state.

I can't even run this game properly on my gaming rig because of the ridiculous (Read 5 FPS) lag.

Do not purchase this game, and if it's in an indie bundle where you can split the revenue, don't even give a cent to the devs.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 87 comments
Cheese Taterson May 4, 2014 @ 2:28am 
It works just fine for me. *shrug*
snowstorm52 May 4, 2014 @ 6:33am 
Works fine here too.
Lunick May 4, 2014 @ 7:16am 
Someone sounds a little mad...
Anti02Gang May 4, 2014 @ 8:15am 
Works fine on my laptop. It's either you don't know how to configure your PC or your system is so broken.

Topic title is misleading. Shame on you for accusing people (Devs) for nothing.
Last edited by Anti02Gang; May 4, 2014 @ 8:15am
the phrase "gaming rig" is used by 0% of the people i know (including myself) who can design and build a computer themselves so i believe the above dude nailed it
Eden May 4, 2014 @ 8:44am 
Haha so much anger, the game is broken, accept it. If it doesn't run on a computer that can max out Skyrim and Battlefield 4, something's wrong.
DarkChaplain May 4, 2014 @ 9:28am 
Just a random suggestion: Enable hardware acceleration for flash on your system.
tmwfte May 4, 2014 @ 9:30am 
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
Haha so much anger, the game is broken, accept it. If it doesn't run on a computer that can max out Skyrim and Battlefield 4, something's wrong.

I'm not having any problems either myself, but your last statement is fallacious. There are easily computers that can max out Skyrim and Battlefield 4, but not run something even less resource intensive like say, Child of Light, which requires a computer that utilizes SSE4. Although relatively standard on computers from the last 3-4 years, you can still have something that otherwise meets or exceeds the other technical specs and can easily run games that don't require the protocol (like say Skyrim and BF4) still not run something with lower sys reqs. The devs who have worked on Double Dragon: Neon, Ducktales Remastered, and BloodRayne Betrayal are actually notorious for doing something similar, causing rather low-req platformers not run on pre-Win 7 computers that don't meet certain hyperthreading requirements (sadly not mentioned on the games' pages).

There could very well be something that Mr. Bree+ uses that your computer does not have. Or, of course, another program conflict. Without knowing your system specs, we can't well say whether or not we'll run into a similar issue that you seem to have found yourself in.
Eden May 4, 2014 @ 10:20am 
Originally posted by tmwfte:
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
Haha so much anger, the game is broken, accept it. If it doesn't run on a computer that can max out Skyrim and Battlefield 4, something's wrong.

I'm not having any problems either myself, but your last statement is fallacious. There are easily computers that can max out Skyrim and Battlefield 4, but not run something even less resource intensive like say, Child of Light, which requires a computer that utilizes SSE4. Although relatively standard on computers from the last 3-4 years, you can still have something that otherwise meets or exceeds the other technical specs and can easily run games that don't require the protocol (like say Skyrim and BF4) still not run something with lower sys reqs. The devs who have worked on Double Dragon: Neon, Ducktales Remastered, and BloodRayne Betrayal are actually notorious for doing something similar, causing rather low-req platformers not run on pre-Win 7 computers that don't meet certain hyperthreading requirements (sadly not mentioned on the games' pages).

There could very well be something that Mr. Bree+ uses that your computer does not have. Or, of course, another program conflict. Without knowing your system specs, we can't well say whether or not we'll run into a similar issue that you seem to have found yourself in.
GTX 780Ti 3GB with ACX cooling, EVGA edition, i7 4770k, 16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro @ 1866MHZ.



Originally posted by DarkChaplain:
Just a random suggestion: Enable hardware acceleration for flash on your system.
I'm fairly sure I have it enabled.
tmwfte May 4, 2014 @ 12:13pm 
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
GTX 780Ti 3GB with ACX cooling, EVGA edition, i7 4770k, 16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro @ 1866MHZ.

OS?
Eden May 4, 2014 @ 12:19pm 
Originally posted by tmwfte:
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
GTX 780Ti 3GB with ACX cooling, EVGA edition, i7 4770k, 16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro @ 1866MHZ.

OS?
Windows 7.
tmwfte May 4, 2014 @ 12:28pm 
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
Windows 7.

It would seem obvious, but 64 or 32 bit?
Eden May 4, 2014 @ 12:40pm 
Originally posted by tmwfte:
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
Windows 7.

It would seem obvious, but 64 or 32 bit?
64 bit, I'm not sure why I'd use 32 bit when I have 16GB RAM :P
tmwfte May 4, 2014 @ 1:23pm 
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
64 bit, I'm not sure why I'd use 32 bit when I have 16GB RAM :P

You'd be surprised. Some people don't realize the ~3/4GB threshold is even there and just wonder why their 8 GB of RAM isn't working with their single core Win XP system.
Eden May 4, 2014 @ 2:16pm 
Originally posted by tmwfte:
Originally posted by Pyrotic:
64 bit, I'm not sure why I'd use 32 bit when I have 16GB RAM :P

You'd be surprised. Some people don't realize the ~3/4GB threshold is even there and just wonder why their 8 GB of RAM isn't working with their single core Win XP system.
These are the people who shouldn't own computers.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 87 comments
Per page: 1530 50