4090 performance :: The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered General Discussions

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered

All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered > General Discussions > Topic Details

Bob_Doe Apr 30 @ 7:29am

4090 performance

I'm playing this game @ 4k ultra everything using DLSS quality and frame gen, the game never dips below 60 fps

All of these people saying the 4090 struggles to hit 60fps are talking rubbish

Edit: to clarify, the game runs between 80 and 120 fps using these settings. However the general consensus seems to be that the game runs like crap and "even a 4090 struggles to hit 60 fps"

Last edited by Bob_Doe; Apr 30 @ 9:23am

< >

Showing 1-15 of 47 comments

Z-Bash Apr 30 @ 7:32am

Isn't the 4090 the second strongest GPU right now? If that was struggling what were they playtesting on?

emitfudd

has The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered

(Banned) Apr 30 @ 7:34am

I am running a 5900X with 4090 on 2K on ultra. With DLSS on balanced I was dipping below 60 FPS. I changed it to performance and now I am staying closer to 100 FPS.

Damon

Apr 30 @ 7:36am

60 fps with frame gen is kinda bad because it will feel like low fps. You rather want adjust settings to it stay 120+ almost whole time without big dips in fps.

Last edited by Damon; Apr 30 @ 7:36am

Nitemares

Apr 30 @ 7:37am

Originally posted by Bob_Doe:
I'm playing this game @ 4k ultra everything using DLSS quality and frame gen, the game never dips below 60 fps

All of these people saying the 4090 struggles to hit 60fps are talking rubbish

Even my 4070 ti holds to 60 frames everywhere in 4k ultra settings.

I think the majority of issues come from people that haven't optimised their rigs, are running a lot of background processes, or poor drivers.

Bob_Doe Apr 30 @ 7:37am

Originally posted by emitfudd:
I am running a 5900X with 4090 on 2K on ultra. With DLSS on balanced I was dipping below 60 FPS. I changed it to performance and now I am staying closer to 100 FPS.

Somethings not right there mate, only difference with my setup is 5700x3d

Last edited by Bob_Doe; Apr 30 @ 7:38am

Bob_Doe Apr 30 @ 7:38am

Originally posted by Damon:
60 fps with frame gen is kinda bad because it will feel like low fps. You rather want adjust settings to it stay 120+ almost whole time without big dips in fps.

I generally hit between 80 and 120fps using gsync so havn't capped it

SkaldedDawg has The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered

Apr 30 @ 7:39am

The performance of UE5 isn't optimized properly. It's janky.

ΜΣ†ΛĿ

Apr 30 @ 7:39am

I'm also playing the game in 4K with a 4090 and there are definitely drops to below 60 FPS, you just have to find the right spots out in the world. if I lower the shadow quality from Ultra to high it's better, but the sure fix is dropping DLSS from quality to Balanced or Performance. DLSS4 Performance/Balanced looks better than DLSS3 Quality.
but that's without Frame Generation, don't measure performance with frame generation, not dropping below 60 FPS with FG really means not dropping below 30 FPS.

Zinny9000

Apr 30 @ 7:41am

4090 here. 2k resolution. 5800X3D. 64GB RAM. All game settings on Ultra. RT hardware off. RT software on low. DLSS on balanced. No Reflex. I very rarely dip below 138 FPS if at all. Installed https://www.nexusmods.com/oblivionremastered/mods/79?tab=files which seems to help. Still get a "stutter" every once in a great while but most of the time the game is buttery smooth.

Zinny9000

Apr 30 @ 7:42am

Forgot to mention I'm using GSync with frames capped to 141 FPS in the NVIDIA control panel. Vsync off in game - on in the control panel.

#10

AmaiAmai Apr 30 @ 7:43am

Originally posted by Z-Bash:
Isn't the 4090 the second strongest GPU right now? If that was struggling what were they playtesting on?

That's the thing, they weren't testing. You are the tester now.

There is no way they tested the game and didn't see the crashing.

Modern game studios don't care about testing or actually fixing bugs because the modern gamer will buy the product anyway. Why should they fix the bugs when you'll buy and keep buying whether they do so or not?

I know I wouldn't. If I could just say "give me money" and you give it, don't deliver, ask you again, and you do the same thing every time -- that's an infinite money glitch I don't want to fix.

#11

ΜΣ†ΛĿ

Apr 30 @ 7:46am

Originally posted by Zinny9000:
Forgot to mention I'm using GSync with frames capped to 141 FPS in the NVIDIA control panel. Vsync off in game - on in the control panel.

you using FG too?

#12

emitfudd

(Banned) Apr 30 @ 7:47am

Originally posted by Zinny9000:
4090 here. 2k resolution. 5800X3D. 64GB RAM. All game settings on Ultra. RT hardware off. RT software on low. DLSS on balanced. No Reflex. I very rarely dip below 138 FPS if at all. Installed https://www.nexusmods.com/oblivionremastered/mods/79?tab=files which seems to help. Still get a "stutter" every once in a great while but most of the time the game is buttery smooth.

I need to go back and look at my settings. The 5800X3D is better than my 5900X but not by much. I watched a video where the 2 were compared in over 10 different games and the difference was less than 10FPS across the board.

#13

Damon

Apr 30 @ 7:49am

Originally posted by Bob_Doe:
Originally posted by Damon:
60 fps with frame gen is kinda bad because it will feel like low fps. You rather want adjust settings to it stay 120+ almost whole time without big dips in fps.

I generally hit between 80 and 120fps using gsync so havn't capped it

Ironically FPS cap at 60 and not running Frame Gen will probably be more smooth than Frame Gen at 60 fps (techinally 30 fps). I still use Frame Gen because it helped me to improve visual quality and still staying at least above 100 fps all time. (using I5-14400f and 4070).

#14