Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's generally what a remaster means, genius. Same game and gameplay for the most part, slightly better graphics
That's not how remakes work. A remaster is a touch up. A remake involves rebuilding from the ground up on a new engine. That's also why I said 1 to 1 as most remakes aren't 1 to 1 they will often change things.
A good example of a actual remaster is dark souls remastered. It's not much of a actual jump from the original game at all to the point many people will argue to play the original if you still have it.
I didn't mean it super literally but in the sense this game is a 1 to 1 remake. Its not like they decided to give us the most modern elder scrolls experience with the oblivion plot.
You're the type of person who wants dark souls 1 remaster without it ever changing, what's the difference? Oh wait the only thing you think is important is your opinion and pathetic political views.
This is also how a remaster should be done, not like the ♥♥♥♥ capcom gave us for resident evil 2 and 3, they're ♥♥♥♥ REMAKES and should be considered permanently as ♥♥♥♥ remakes.
no its not ...demons souls remake is a remake this is not the same thing this is the exact same game we all know from 2006 with a fresh coat of varnish over it.