how is optimization ?

[ViLKAS.]

I have an RTX 4060 and I'm wondering if it's worth buying this game because I see people with 4070 and even 4090 having problems with in this game

[Slender]

yeah I've got a 4070 super and it's... okay... I mean like it's over 60 pretty much all the time, but with 144hz monitor it sucks

[thermoplastics]

It's UE5, and as expected it's an unoptimized mess that requires frame gen and upscaling just to get an okay frame rate

[NetshadeX]

If you can resist the urge to put everything on Ultra at native 4K you should be fine. For reference, I get 50-55 fps at 4K maxed settings/DLSS Performance on a 4070Ti, frame gen puts me around 70-80.

Instead I dropped down to all High settings, DLSS performance and capped fps at 60. The visual drop from Ultra to High is negligible.

[Drewcifer]

It is rough. 4060 here, I get around 120 to 10. As soon as multiple characters are on screen my frames just tank hard.

[spicy little monkey]

Originally posted by thermoplastics:

It's UE5, and as expected it's an unoptimized mess that requires frame gen and upscaling just to get an okay frame rate

Not even close to true

[SiN]

Originally posted by NetshadeX:

If you can resist the urge to put everything on Ultra at native 4K you should be fine. For reference, I get 50-55 fps at 4K maxed settings/DLSS Performance on a 4070Ti, frame gen puts me around 70-80.

Instead I dropped down to all High settings, DLSS performance and capped fps at 60. The visual drop from Ultra to High is negligible.

lmao. You're playing at 50% resolution with frame gen, so without frame gen it is about 30-40fps at 1080p.

That answers op's optimization question.

[spicy little monkey]

Originally posted by SiN:

Originally posted by NetshadeX:

If you can resist the urge to put everything on Ultra at native 4K you should be fine. For reference, I get 50-55 fps at 4K maxed settings/DLSS Performance on a 4070Ti, frame gen puts me around 70-80.

Instead I dropped down to all High settings, DLSS performance and capped fps at 60. The visual drop from Ultra to High is negligible.

lmao. You're playing at 50% resolution with frame gen, so without frame gen it is about 30-40fps at 1080p.

That answers op's optimization question.

No he was getting 50-55fps without fake frames, read again

[f00b]

Not terrible, not good.

[Lamp]

Was playing on my 4090, i7-10700. 165fps until I got outside: 25fps. Turned the graphics down a bit and it was still like 25ish fps. But- I didn't have frame gen on because it was greyed out.

Enabled GPU scheduling today so I could use the framegen stuff: game gets stuck on 1fps infinite loading screen while maxing out CPU use.

The optimisation is a fking mess.

[Oustcell]

"It just works"

[Gibbel]

3080 - 5700X3D

High setting 1440P stable 60 fps capt. (without it's between 64-110)
However I still get stutters even though it at 60 FPS.
Game run pretty horrible for how it looks. I mean compared to KCD2 which looks objectively better specially in wood like areas the performance compared is horrible.

[ThinkOn]

It's bethesda so unoptimised as per usual

[BlueShadow]

Gtx 1080 ti user with a ryzen 9 5900x, 32gb ram, in 144p on medium outside 40 ish fps.

[Brigadoom]

Using a 4050 laptop, pretty terrible when in the open world. Decent when inside small areas. I had to play on Low everything except Texture which was Medium for stability and my FPS is still really bad.

[spicy little monkey]

Originally posted by Brigadoom:

Using a 4050 laptop, pretty terrible when in the open world. Decent when inside small areas. I had to play on Low everything except Texture which was Medium for stability and my FPS is still really bad.

Well you are using a low end laptop