Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
figures.
I'm sure that site is highly credible and maintained by literary scholars.
But let's take the answer Sir Yo gave- "It’s definitely mostly used in a racist sense these days."
a) mostly does not indicate always
b) these days. As in today. 2015. Not in a Lovecraftian backdrop to a video game.
I am swarthy if I allow myself to tan. Being tan comes from working in the fields. In the past to be tan meant you were a field worker, a member of the lower class. The upper class prided themselves in how pale they were. In the context of the time, it was a classist thing. Which is appropriate considering the narrator was a rich piece of debaucherous swine.
You want to get upset but it isn't something to be upset about, it is authentic dailogue. It is almost throw away as it was part of mention in passing. Many people in the past were bigoted, that was the norm.
That's not exactly a very authoratative source on what you're trying to prove
The problem with most claims of racism these days is that people have bought into the notion of subjectivity in communication. What I mean by that is that the meaning of something is determined by the hearer, not the speaker. Because you hear something and say "I feel that this is racist", then suddently it becomes so.
But this makes all communication useless because we can just assign any meaning we want to anything. An intellectually honest way to view communication is to try to understand what the speaker means by a phrase, not what you believe it means.
I doubt the makers of this game are a bunch of racist bigots, which have become more mythological these days than reality. So mabey instead of saying "thats racist" you ought to ask the developers what they mean by the word or look at it in it's context.
Not to mention merely setting something in a historically accurate context of the time (or imagined time) in no way endorses the popular beliefs or behaviors of that time. So when the documentary "Roots" was portraying racism, nobody claims it was endorsing it.
Common sense 101 here people!
And yeah people are far too sensitive nowadays, jeez.
You're definitely taking things too far, to the point that your obsessive political correctness is nearing the realm of mental illness. I would advise staying away from tumblr, reddit, or whichever is the culprit in your case. Such places tend to take otherwise reasonable people and throw them into various downward spirals, until they become entirely dysfunctional and prone to making ridiculous assumptions.
In this context the desire for "swarthy" workers means ones that are, visably, qualified workers. For example, an old fisherman might be dark skinned and salty, or a farmer burly, tanned, and having calloused hands. This obviously has nothing to do with race, but rather their capability as labourers and the appearance that would result from extensive experience.
The workers in the intro video at the time the word is used are all light skinned, as is everyone else in the intro. That alone should've been enough to let you know what they were referring to their conditioning and not anything to do with race.