Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
No it's not. The Fallagent has a base of 70% and I can check my stats when buffed, it goes higher.
Oh well. No zero health 200 stress build yet then. Maybe a modded trinket to do it so it's not supid overpowered...
https://darkestdungeon.gamepedia.com/Death%27s_Door
EDIT:
That means that if you get attacked on DD with 87% resist 5 times there is about 50/50 chance of survival. If you get hit 10 times your chance of survival is around 25%. If you get hit 20 times the chance are about 6,2%.
gamepedia are made by players not developers anyway you shoudnt believe in 100%.
Just as a general hint. The internet is smarter then you, it is smarter then developers. Do you really think people have not hacked this game and found out the exact values yet? No one have done tests? I know of cases within real research that scientists have struggled for at least 13 years with, the internet solved it within 10 days. While the developers of this game are at most a few hundred, the amount of players are above thusands. Do not dismiss collective knowledge of more people just because they are not devs, you are also not a dev so by what right do you have to dismiss it with your logic?
Conceivably, you could heal the stressed out hero to get them off of zero health (and death's door), but, at that point, most of the party could very well be afflicted and, as a result, uncooperative. Some excellent examples:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSLgfnYdn0M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc5kIlTa6yU
The fact that deathblow resistance is capped at 87% is just another nail in the coffin. It's effectively impossible to be "bullet proof" in Darkest Dungeon.
all wikis are made by non-organised group of people. Always is chance when some of that peole write false or only speculation. I never negate what was write in gamepedia but i have speculation when was write because it always a chance of stale information.
btw my last comment is only speculation when 87% are not really true information. Possibility not 100% true.
Anyone can write on a wiki yes, but if someone notice something wrong it can also be changed and removed by everyone. Do you think wikis are not moderated? Well then I have a suprise for you, they actually are. There are people that moderate all wikis so people do not write whatever they want. This was a issue during GamerGate when it was discovered that the moderators that was controlling the GamerGate Wikipedia page had a political bias. If you think a wiki can't be trusted go and look up how it is wrong. When it comes to games they rarely are. When it comes to history or real science you can't trust wikis as comprehensive knowledge, political issues are also horrible. But with games you can true pretty much 100% that what is said there is true after the game have been out for a while. The only reason it shouldn't is if no one is playing the game and a very few amount of people have contributed. The more contributions the more correct it is. It is stupid to assume just because you don't know the people behind the contributions it is wrong.
now that's risk/reward maximizing!
I have both a high level revenant, and this trinket, and have been at death's door with that character... but still have not used the trinket. too risky.
still.. the trinkets he's using add 50% damage as it is. I'd be curious to see what a 150% damage crit looks like.
I think it is irritating when a game outright lies about specific statistics. It's one thing to keep them behind a veil so the actual chance just isn't known, but if you're giving a specific % number it should damn well not be some made up fake number.