Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
try it and let us know, I assume most will work , but will be out of order, about to test the theory myself though :)
Sakhir seems mostly right, but who knows.
F1 cars setups should absolutely be a critical and vital part of any F1 ( as well as the track determining what your setup should be ) game .... especially a management game.
This feature is just another example of a toothless mini game within a game that is useless. It has no bearing whatsoever in the outcome of your races.
It also decreases their chance of incidents.
A poor setup can give negative buffs to those attributes, while increasing the chance of incidents.
I'm not going to argue with a sycophant so test it out for yourself and see!
You are pretty wrong here.
The setup, hence coindence has an influence on race performance.
1.) As Tassie already mentioned you get a buff for good setup, be it +1, +2 or +3 each for braking, cornering, ect.... This obviously influences race pace without any doubt, be it only by a little.
2.) The lower the coindence the higher the chance of mistakes, crashes, ect... Someone must have a very optimistic overview to say that such things do not influence the race at all.
But yes, there is no need to argue, it's too obvious to even discuss this even further, leave alone to argue.