Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=74414203&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4807:izqrt0.3.23
NOT A LAWYER DISCLAIMER:
But, you can get limited protection for some generic words when using them in a specific industry. 'Gauntlet' is a perfectly valid thing to trademark for 'computer programs for video games'.
Their trademark could stop others from other games using 'gauntlet' as part of the title, but would not stop a paint manufacturer from using it to name a paint or other product.
A recentish example that backs this up is the failed attempt by Bethesda to stop a game called 'scrolls' from being published because they claimed it violated their trademark for 'The Elder Scrolls'.
If anyone would sue over a name, it would be the movie industry.
you can, but they tend to change back when steam updates. open steam/appcache/appinfo.vdf with notepad++ and you can edit as you like.
USA patent/trademark office rejects most single title movie names for trademark. Some exceptions exist like 'Star Wars'.
The MPAA also runs its own movie title registration process for its members, which is why we do not see trademark issues like this happen with Hollywood.
Video games are technically computer software programs which actually have a long history of trademark issues/disputes. This stems from how easy it is to create/publish new software in a way that can confuse consumers with clever branding. Remeber the makes of CandyCrush trying to sue everyone for using the word 'Candy' in their game names?
I lost interest in the case shortly after it was announced, but IIRC they settled.
A trademark can be a word, phrase, symbol, or design that distinguishes the source of the goods or services. Also, as trade dress, it can be the appearance of a product or its packaging, including size, shape, color, texture, graphics, and appearance (e.g, retail store or website).
I can still market a window-cleaning product called Gauntlet.
I could (proably) also make a game called "The Gauntlet of Lord Whatshisface" with a prominent picture of a mailed fist on the cover in the turn-based RPG segment.
Trademarks don't mean you own the word, they mean you are using the term as an identifier of a product/brand/etc. Others are supposed to be prevented from using confusingly similar product names / trade presentation etc.
Now for the practical side, it's largely about who can waste who's time in court. You need a minimum of legal plausibility here, so the laws are relevant. But if you have orders of magnitude more money (Candy Crusher) then you don't necessarily need much to get other people to do what you want.