Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
When you put in hours and hours, and have to change your fine-tuned gameplay because some off-beaten (albeit, nice enough for other modes) map comes along.
There is a reason why all previous maps were of the same size and proportion. The introduction of these two maps throws everything off kilter. Period. End of discussion. I'm right, you're wrong.
Like the maps all you want, or dislike them-- but they do not belong in competitive.
How about we add some slopes to a football field in the NFL or to a basketball court in NBA? That would never stand. Think about it.
And are you talking about Handegg or actual football?
You need more proof?