2v3 in a tournament?

[Elroy]

This is unfair af man, wtf is this system?

[GrunzJr]

It's working correctly. If a player doesn't connect, for whichever reason, the match cannot be cancelled as the rest of the Tournament depends on it. If you wish to avoid this, party up with other players beforehand.

[LordFastTrakz]

I'm surprised you expected anything different than a half finished product, the only people at Psyonix worth their position is the art department. Everything else is released with a if it barley works it still works mentality.

[Handcannon in D]

Originally posted by LordFastTrakz:

I'm surprised you expected anything different than a half finished product, the only people at Psyonix worth their position is the art department. Everything else is released with a if it barley works it still works mentality.

If you had to leave immediately for whatever reason, a tournament game in Rocket League isn't going to stop you if it was serious enough. I've played about 6-7 tournaments solo, all players there for both teams every time so I'm finding it hard to believe it's a massive problem. If players don't show up, that's on them and unlucky for you.

The only other alternative would be for those latecomers that can't join on first or second time because of it being full, Psyonix could introduce a substitute system. I find that hard to implement though because then people wouldn't be guaranteed a game but would have to wait to play just for the CHANCE to fill a spot if someone doesn't show up. So I think it's fine the way it is, even if it happens to me.

[Sepioth]

I just had a 1v3 in a 2nd chance ...

[LordFastTrakz]

Originally posted by Monkey!:

Originally posted by LordFastTrakz:

I'm surprised you expected anything different than a half finished product, the only people at Psyonix worth their position is the art department. Everything else is released with a if it barley works it still works mentality.

If you had to leave immediately for whatever reason, a tournament game in Rocket League isn't going to stop you if it was serious enough. I've played about 6-7 tournaments solo, all players there for both teams every time so I'm finding it hard to believe it's a massive problem. If players don't show up, that's on them and unlucky for you.

The only other alternative would be for those latecomers that can't join on first or second time because of it being full, Psyonix could introduce a substitute system. I find that hard to implement though because then people wouldn't be guaranteed a game but would have to wait to play just for the CHANCE to fill a spot if someone doesn't show up. So I think it's fine the way it is, even if it happens to me.

If there is a remote chance of needing to leave, you should not be entering a tournament in the first place, especially with people you don't know. The sanction for leaving should reflect this to a weeks suspension for entering another one, not the same amount of time until the next one is taking entries.

Would not solve it but its a start for those who leave often. I've seen it first hand and just don't enter them anymore since I got the title and the loot is not worth the grind.

Substitutes would be fine for the duration of the tournament with the reward % adjusted to reflect the time invested. A static backfill bonus should be sufficient to make it worth their while waiting as a sub. Extra XP bonus or a non-tournament crate.

Lots of things they could do, but tournaments don't make them extra cash so its not a priority.

[5kimi]

yea, just dont visit their twitter before posting bs. way too complicated to that beforehand

[Monkey]

i think many players cant even connect to the server because they have server issues.

[NorciM]

Originally posted by xxan:

*AHEM* you said YOU dont believe it? good for you, as someone who HAS been in ROUND ONE 2v3--me alone OFTEN you lie it IS a m"massive problem" considering i RAIRLY bother with them, yet SINCE DAY ONE almost EVERY SINGLE TIME, its like that, so, again, you lie, it IS a mass prob

+1

[Handcannon in D]

Originally posted by LordFastTrakz:

Originally posted by Monkey!:

If you had to leave immediately for whatever reason, a tournament game in Rocket League isn't going to stop you if it was serious enough. I've played about 6-7 tournaments solo, all players there for both teams every time so I'm finding it hard to believe it's a massive problem. If players don't show up, that's on them and unlucky for you.

The only other alternative would be for those latecomers that can't join on first or second time because of it being full, Psyonix could introduce a substitute system. I find that hard to implement though because then people wouldn't be guaranteed a game but would have to wait to play just for the CHANCE to fill a spot if someone doesn't show up. So I think it's fine the way it is, even if it happens to me.

If there is a remote chance of needing to leave, you should not be entering a tournament in the first place, especially with people you don't know. The sanction for leaving should reflect this to a weeks suspension for entering another one, not the same amount of time until the next one is taking entries.

Would not solve it but its a start for those who leave often. I've seen it first hand and just don't enter them anymore since I got the title and the loot is not worth the grind.

Substitutes would be fine for the duration of the tournament with the reward % adjusted to reflect the time invested. A static backfill bonus should be sufficient to make it worth their while waiting as a sub. Extra XP bonus or a non-tournament crate.

Lots of things they could do, but tournaments don't make them extra cash so its not a priority.

Emergencies happen so let's not waste time talking about what is and what is not included in that. That would be painful. Things happen, some people get bothered by it, some people just roll with it. I'm fine if a player is down as I find it's the most logical way to deal with it unless they implement the substitute part with the incentive of in-game currency (nice idea).

A week's suspension = If you want to kill any interest in tournaments.

If there was some way of logging serial offenders of leaving in tournaments. As in if it happens two-three times within a month then possibly can make it better for others. As I said though, I'm fine with the way it is but so far I've been unaffected by it.

[Handcannon in D]

Originally posted by xxan:

*AHEM* you said YOU dont believe it? good for you, as someone who HAS been in ROUND ONE 2v3--me alone OFTEN you lie it IS a m"massive problem" considering i RAIRLY bother with them, yet SINCE DAY ONE almost EVERY SINGLE TIME, its like that, so, again, you lie, it IS a mass prob

Yes, if I play around 7 tournaments and both teams are full for every single game then logically for me, it isn't a massive problem. I actually said this in the last post.

I'm sorry to hear they've been terrible for you, I'm the opposite as they've worked flawlessly.

[Riči]

today i was 1v3 , First game win next one lose . EZ BTW my 2nd mate joined after first game :D 3 not joined

[LordFastTrakz]

Originally posted by Monkey!:

Originally posted by LordFastTrakz:

If there is a remote chance of needing to leave, you should not be entering a tournament in the first place, especially with people you don't know. The sanction for leaving should reflect this to a weeks suspension for entering another one, not the same amount of time until the next one is taking entries.

Would not solve it but its a start for those who leave often. I've seen it first hand and just don't enter them anymore since I got the title and the loot is not worth the grind.

Substitutes would be fine for the duration of the tournament with the reward % adjusted to reflect the time invested. A static backfill bonus should be sufficient to make it worth their while waiting as a sub. Extra XP bonus or a non-tournament crate.

Lots of things they could do, but tournaments don't make them extra cash so its not a priority.

Emergencies happen so let's not waste time talking about what is and what is not included in that. That would be painful. Things happen, some people get bothered by it, some people just roll with it. I'm fine if a player is down as I find it's the most logical way to deal with it unless they implement the substitute part with the incentive of in-game currency (nice idea).

A week's suspension = If you want to kill any interest in tournaments.

If there was some way of logging serial offenders of leaving in tournaments. As in if it happens two-three times within a month then possibly can make it better for others. As I said though, I'm fine with the way it is but so far I've been unaffected by it.

Lets face it, the vast majority of people who are declining the invite to join the tournament they entered or are just plain leaving when a couple of bad plays are made are not leaving due to a life and death situation arising. And the weeks sanction would only kill the scene if people leaving was a common. If its not common then 99% of players have nothing to worry about, however if it has such an impact it kills the mode then there are bigger problems that need to be addressed before it can be classed as sound and stable.

[Cric]

Just played a 1vs2, but one of my mates made it into the game later.
It is not the fault of leavin players. Epic just ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up epic. They have problems joining the servers.

[🆁🅰🅵🅸]

DUDE 3 TIMES I PLAY 1 V 3 on TURNAMENT WTF

[TommyEV]

yeah i just played 2v4 this game is joke