One guy says PC version runs well, another guy says it doesn't.

[Darb Yelur]

This review (https://wccftech.com/review/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-coming-back-to-life/) says:

The performance also leaves something to be desired. During a benchmark session comprising a round trip of the entire mall starting from the security room, my system (i7-13700F, RTX 4080, 32 GB RAM) ran the game at 4K resolution, DLSS Quality and the settings shown in the screenshots below at an average of 161 frames per second, 57 FPS 1% low, which was caused by some stuttering here and there which mostly occurred when leaving the security room and traversing the mall. The game also supports NVIDIA DLSS 3 Frame Generation, which caused some stuttering issues during select cutscenes and desync between visuals and audio but worked mostly fine during gameplay. I also noticed more stuttering during gameplay with Frame Generation, but that may have been a coincidence, as stuttering is not a rare occurrence even without it.

However this (https://www.dsogaming.com/pc-performance-analyses/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-benchmarks-pc-performance-analysis/) says:

Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster requires at least a quad-core CPU. While the framerates were acceptable on our simulated dual-core PC system, we had MAJOR stuttering issues that made the game unplayable. We also had some stutters on our quad-core system without SMT/Hyper-Threading. With SMT/Hyper-Threading, we were able to completely eliminate those stutters (we also saw a small performance increase).

------------------------

All in all, Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster is a great remaster. The game runs great on PC, and it does not require a high-end PC system to be enjoyed.

Who to believe?

[Nezuko Pizza Delivery]

I’m waiting for steam deck videos before I get it on steam

[PIngouin_FRA]

Originally posted by Darb:

This review (https://wccftech.com/review/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-coming-back-to-life/) says:

The performance also leaves something to be desired. During a benchmark session comprising a round trip of the entire mall starting from the security room, my system (i7-13700F, RTX 4080, 32 GB RAM) ran the game at 4K resolution, DLSS Quality and the settings shown in the screenshots below at an average of 161 frames per second, 57 FPS 1% low, which was caused by some stuttering here and there which mostly occurred when leaving the security room and traversing the mall. The game also supports NVIDIA DLSS 3 Frame Generation, which caused some stuttering issues during select cutscenes and desync between visuals and audio but worked mostly fine during gameplay. I also noticed more stuttering during gameplay with Frame Generation, but that may have been a coincidence, as stuttering is not a rare occurrence even without it.

However this (https://www.dsogaming.com/pc-performance-analyses/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-benchmarks-pc-performance-analysis/) says:

Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster requires at least a quad-core CPU. While the framerates were acceptable on our simulated dual-core PC system, we had MAJOR stuttering issues that made the game unplayable. We also had some stutters on our quad-core system without SMT/Hyper-Threading. With SMT/Hyper-Threading, we were able to completely eliminate those stutters (we also saw a small performance increase).

------------------------

All in all, Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster is a great remaster. The game runs great on PC, and it does not require a high-end PC system to be enjoyed.

Who to believe?

Tell us a day one game on pc, run good

[Verdeth]

well the pc domain is vast, there are so many systems, some are overlcocked, some are not, some ran for 4+ years and have issues, some are brand new, some use outdated drivers, some use a pirated windows version, etc

the only way to know if it runs on your system is: to try it out yourself, if it works enjoy, if not either wait or refund. this is steam after all.

[Player 9000]

Originally posted by Nezuko Pizza Delivery:

I’m waiting for steam deck videos before I get it on steam

I really need to get a 2 tb sd card at this point.
I'm rolling with a 64 lcd and 256sd card still.

only big games i got on steam deck are elden ring and resident evil 1 remake. rest are smaller 1 gb games or emu stuff, my emu stuff is pretty curated though so not to crazy.

[Nezuko Pizza Delivery]

Originally posted by Player 9000:

Originally posted by Nezuko Pizza Delivery:

I’m waiting for steam deck videos before I get it on steam

I really need to get a 2 tb sd card at this point.
I'm rolling with a 64 lcd and 256sd card still.

only big games i got on steam deck are elden ring and resident evil 1 remake. rest are smaller 1 gb games or emu stuff, my emu stuff is pretty curated though so not to crazy.

Investing into a bigger SD card is totally worth it, steam deck itself likes to take a good chunk of storage already, plus less of a headache if you play games with a lot of mods.

[HAVE GUN WILL SHOOT]

Hope it runs better the DD2 after all its updates.

[Exiled]

161 fps at 4K "leaves something to be desired" I swear these reviewers get dumber and dumber. The ♥♥♥♥ are they talking about getting 161 fps at 4k and complaining...

[RubberduckzillA RIP Alwyn]

Originally posted by Zach:

161 fps at 4K "leaves something to be desired" I swear these reviewers get dumber and dumber. The ♥♥♥♥ are they talking about getting 161 fps at 4k and complaining...

To be fair it is DLSS quality which means it is probably more around 1440p maybe lower. Hate it when people call FAUX 4K 4K, make me not trust a word they say abotu performance. Personally good news to me I hate DLSS in motion always looks worse in every single bloody game. 161fps maxed at at 1440p with all the detail in the game sounds great to me.

I''ll be away from my rig in just over 2 weeks for months though so hoping I can still play it on deck.

[Lieutenant Dan]

Originally posted by Zach:

161 fps at 4K "leaves something to be desired" I swear these reviewers get dumber and dumber. The ♥♥♥♥ are they talking about getting 161 fps at 4k and complaining...

161 with -100fps 1%lows with DLSS quality mode is not ok on a 4090 btw.
just saying

[BRADL3RO]

Originally posted by Lieutenant Dan:

Originally posted by Zach:

161 fps at 4K "leaves something to be desired" I swear these reviewers get dumber and dumber. The ♥♥♥♥ are they talking about getting 161 fps at 4k and complaining...

161 with -100fps 1%lows with DLSS quality mode is not ok on a 4090 btw.
just saying

It says 4080 by the looks of it, not a 4090.

[Exiled]

Originally posted by Lieutenant Dan:

Originally posted by Zach:

161 fps at 4K "leaves something to be desired" I swear these reviewers get dumber and dumber. The ♥♥♥♥ are they talking about getting 161 fps at 4k and complaining...

161 with -100fps 1%lows with DLSS quality mode is not ok on a 4090 btw.
just saying

1% lows are meaningless if its an issue with traversal stutter. Doesn't reflect the actual lows based on actual performance requirements and is more of an issue of how modern engines work.

Doesn't matter if you have a 1060 or 4090 if the 1% lows are reflecting traversal stutter or shader stutter. If shader stutter the devs can actually fix most of the issues so if that's the problem yes they need to fix the issues. Could be part of a patch along with optimized drivers.

[ChubbiChibbai]

I'd say more often than not its the general PC gamer today that has zero clue what is needed to run a game well. From specific hardware to certain settings in game.

Had a friend complaining about load times in a new game only to find out he was running it off a hard disk.

Another who has zero clue that his 2060 is not a top end card and he shouldn't expect it to ever run 4K these days (even at launch). But in his mind he paid for an 'expensive' card back when it launched and saw the 2 in the name not even considering what the 060 meant (it means budget with less vram etc)

I've bought so many games over the last few years that people have all had people complain about performance and manged to run them with zero issues. Only one that had actual issues was Dragons Dogma 2 which is now fixed.

So when i see performance issues in a game i put it down to someone being incompetent more than the devs being incompetent and i try for myself. If it actually has issues then i refund.

[H-Foundry PIXIV]

don't worry it won't be long before youtubers will be tearing it down to the 1% lows in less than 48 hours.

I really hope Gamers Nexus does one. They did a real good job with Dragons Dogma 2 (which fanboys hated and called them amatures lol).

[Jarty]

Originally posted by Darb:

This review (https://wccftech.com/review/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-coming-back-to-life/) says:

The performance also leaves something to be desired. During a benchmark session comprising a round trip of the entire mall starting from the security room, my system (i7-13700F, RTX 4080, 32 GB RAM) ran the game at 4K resolution, DLSS Quality and the settings shown in the screenshots below at an average of 161 frames per second, 57 FPS 1% low, which was caused by some stuttering here and there which mostly occurred when leaving the security room and traversing the mall. The game also supports NVIDIA DLSS 3 Frame Generation, which caused some stuttering issues during select cutscenes and desync between visuals and audio but worked mostly fine during gameplay. I also noticed more stuttering during gameplay with Frame Generation, but that may have been a coincidence, as stuttering is not a rare occurrence even without it.

However this (https://www.dsogaming.com/pc-performance-analyses/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-benchmarks-pc-performance-analysis/) says:

Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster requires at least a quad-core CPU. While the framerates were acceptable on our simulated dual-core PC system, we had MAJOR stuttering issues that made the game unplayable. We also had some stutters on our quad-core system without SMT/Hyper-Threading. With SMT/Hyper-Threading, we were able to completely eliminate those stutters (we also saw a small performance increase).

------------------------

All in all, Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster is a great remaster. The game runs great on PC, and it does not require a high-end PC system to be enjoyed.

Who to believe?

well if you dont got a quad core cpu in 2024 might be time to upgrade.

[PawgaliciouS QueeN]

Originally posted by Darb:

This review (https://wccftech.com/review/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-coming-back-to-life/) says:

The performance also leaves something to be desired. During a benchmark session comprising a round trip of the entire mall starting from the security room, my system (i7-13700F, RTX 4080, 32 GB RAM) ran the game at 4K resolution, DLSS Quality and the settings shown in the screenshots below at an average of 161 frames per second, 57 FPS 1% low, which was caused by some stuttering here and there which mostly occurred when leaving the security room and traversing the mall. The game also supports NVIDIA DLSS 3 Frame Generation, which caused some stuttering issues during select cutscenes and desync between visuals and audio but worked mostly fine during gameplay. I also noticed more stuttering during gameplay with Frame Generation, but that may have been a coincidence, as stuttering is not a rare occurrence even without it.

However this (https://www.dsogaming.com/pc-performance-analyses/dead-rising-deluxe-remaster-benchmarks-pc-performance-analysis/) says:

Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster requires at least a quad-core CPU. While the framerates were acceptable on our simulated dual-core PC system, we had MAJOR stuttering issues that made the game unplayable. We also had some stutters on our quad-core system without SMT/Hyper-Threading. With SMT/Hyper-Threading, we were able to completely eliminate those stutters (we also saw a small performance increase).

------------------------

All in all, Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster is a great remaster. The game runs great on PC, and it does not require a high-end PC system to be enjoyed.

Who to believe?

Umm who doesn't have more than 4 cores in 2024? That's the answer you were looking for, potato crying.