Rust doesn't use CPU and GPU as supposed to

[個人萊夫蘭仇恨者]

I have Ryzen 5 7600X and 4070, playing in 2k, no fps limit, have high priority for rust in task manager
No matter which settings do I set, my fps is always around 100-130, but that's weird.
I have seen different youtube videos from guys who was testing rust with the same specs and they had 200+ fps all the time.

What's the problem? I have DDR5 5200 32 GB of RAM, really good motherboard, but during the game I can see that CPU and GPU age loaded maximum on 50%, sometimes even less.

Other games takes 100% of my GPU and more than 50% of CPU.

Do you guys have or had similar issue, how did you fix that ?

[󠁳 ⁧katti]

That's the fps you are supposed to get with 7600X. The problem with rust is that it only performs "well" with high end cpus and cpus with a lot of 3D cache. (5800X3D, 7800X3D...)
So basically rust is poorly optimized, but 100-130 fps is still very good for your specs. Maybe the guy with 200+ fps was on some empty modded server that has fps boosted map or something.
I had same fps around 120 with Ryzen 5 5800X, but when I upgraded to 7800X3D im getting 200+ all the time

[個人萊夫蘭仇恨者]

Thanks for answer, it sucks.

Have already ordered ryzen 9 7900x3d, hopefully will get those freaking at least 165 stable fps

[VikingDork]

It's not a processor issue mate. Check that vram!

[󠁳 ⁧katti]

Originally posted by mp5a4player:

Thanks for answer, it sucks.

Have already ordered ryzen 9 7900x3d, hopefully will get those freaking at least 165 stable fps

7900x3d is a lot worse than 7800x3d. it's L3 cache is split between 2 ccd and so you can only use 50% while gaming. (Gaming parks half of the cores on that processor) it should still be better than your old cpu for sure. But 7900x3d was a failure from AMD and it's in the bottom of every tierlist

[個人萊夫蘭仇恨者]

Now it's even more sucks to be me