Only $50?

[DB]

Why do I see no threads about this? If it were to be $70 people would be making threads, but now they don't even want to talk about it and give a compliment for how fair of a price this is?

[Quake Nukem]

yes because this game has been out already for over a year why would i ever spend full price on a game already out for over a year. it's just like those epic exclusive launch games that later come to steam on sale price. personally i will wait till this game is even cheaper before buying because I am tired of Square Enix releasing games on PS then releasing them year+ later on PC. Nah either release it at the same time or i just will wait till it's dirt cheap to play and ensure they get the least amount of profits from me.

[DB]

Originally posted by Amir:

yes because this game has been out already for over a year why would i ever spend full price on a game already out for over a year. it's just like those epic exclusive launch games that later come to steam on sale price. personally i will wait till this game is even cheaper before buying because I am tired of Square Enix releasing games on PS then releasing them year+ later on PC. Nah either release it at the same time or i just will wait till it's dirt cheap to play and ensure they get the least amount of profits from me.

Last time I checked, Super Mario Odyssey and Zelda Breath of The Wild are still $60. Every now and then when I decide to dust off my PS5 I see new games that are $80 and old games that are still $70.

When did age ever decide the price of a game?

[Mu'Ammar of Carthus]

Originally posted by DBTHEPLUG:

Why do I see no threads about this? If it were to be $70 people would be making threads, but now they don't even want to talk about it and give a compliment for how fair of a price this is?

Because like you said, it's fair.
70 or 80 for a game that came out years ago on another platform, not quite.

[DB]

Originally posted by Mu'Ammar of Carthus:

Originally posted by DBTHEPLUG:

Why do I see no threads about this? If it were to be $70 people would be making threads, but now they don't even want to talk about it and give a compliment for how fair of a price this is?

Because like you said, it's fair.
70 or 80 for a game that came out years ago on another platform, not quite.

When did age ever decide the price of a game?

[Chouchers]

It $50 or steam and still $70 on PSN store.

[Crene]

thank god i stop playing on xbox/PS console not willing to pay more then 60 for a new game

[0wnz0r]

price is how it should be considerin its age. no need for praise.

[DB]

Originally posted by 0wnz0r:

price is how it should be considerin its age. no need for praise.

Mario Odyssey and Zelda Breath of The Wild cost more than this game.

I have many examples of actual aged games that are more expensive than what you call an aged game.

Where do people get the idea from that a game lowers in price the older it gets?

[Melodia]

Originally posted by alumlovescake:

So it should be that price on PC. You can't call £50 a fair price

I can call you entitled, however.

[Caz]

Originally posted by decizion:

Fair pricing, instantly bought complete edition. Unlike other greedy Japanese publisher like the recent EDF 6 from D3PUBLISHER asking 59,99€ for a two years old game and they still sell additional dlc's on top of that LMAO.

You'll get hundreds of hours of fun out of EDF 6. Unlike Final Fantasy: Cutscene Simulator that you'll put maybe 40 hours into. Stick with your cutscene simulator.

[Umbral Priestess]

Originally posted by DBTHEPLUG:

Originally posted by 0wnz0r:

price is how it should be considerin its age. no need for praise.

Mario Odyssey and Zelda Breath of The Wild cost more than this game.

I have many examples of actual aged games that are more expensive than what you call an aged game.

Where do people get the idea from that a game lowers in price the older it gets?

Out his arse, of course, games 5+ years old that still go for $60+ outside of sales on PS, it's still going for over the actual full price of $70, some people just don't think before posting.

[DB]

Originally posted by Umbral Priestess:

Originally posted by DBTHEPLUG:

Mario Odyssey and Zelda Breath of The Wild cost more than this game.

I have many examples of actual aged games that are more expensive than what you call an aged game.

Where do people get the idea from that a game lowers in price the older it gets?

Out his arse, of course, games 5+ years old that still go for $60+ outside of sales on PS, it's still going for over the actual full price of $70, some people just don't think before posting.

[JuggzJudy]

I paid $70 on release for the PS5 version because I'm a ♥♥♥♥♥ for the franchise. Big praise to square for dropping it to $50 for the PC release. Could have easily milked the game for more than it's worth.

[Mu'Ammar of Carthus]

Originally posted by DBTHEPLUG:

Originally posted by Mu'Ammar of Carthus:

Because like you said, it's fair.
70 or 80 for a game that came out years ago on another platform, not quite.

When did age ever decide the price of a game?

This is why I usually don't even waste my time checking if someone replied, especially on that cesspool called the Steam forums.

Subservient drones desperate to defend games with the most moronic non-arguments everywhere.

[Nyx]

Originally posted by DBTHEPLUG:

Originally posted by 0wnz0r:

price is how it should be considerin its age. no need for praise.

Mario Odyssey and Zelda Breath of The Wild cost more than this game.

I have many examples of actual aged games that are more expensive than what you call an aged game.

Where do people get the idea from that a game lowers in price the older it gets?

FFXVI PC edition: $70 for the full game
TOTK: $70 for the full game
BOTW: $60 for the base game
Mario Odyssey: $60 for the full game