What’s your guys rating so far?

[gabagool]

Curious because I’m interested in getting the game but want your guys’ opinions!

[Kryptonian Gaming x]

Publicado originalmente por Chubzdoomer:

For me it's a 7/10. There's massive potential, and the alpha test is already more stable and performant than any Battlefield alpha/beta test I've ever participated in. Heck, if they pushed it out the door tomorrow I don't think anyone would complain about it being too soon.

The graphics are pretty good and the gunplay feels very satisfying and responsive. Killing other players feels like it should IMO, and when I get killed I almost never feel like I've been "wronged" by the game (the feel of the weapons and the netcode are both in a surprisingly good state, at least in my experience). The weapon customization also seriously rocks.

The main negatives I have are the audio, infantry movement, and "operator" system.

The audio/sound design "feels" like something you would expect from a cheaply-made F2P game. Weapons lack "OOMPH" and directional audio seriously sucks. You can't even really hear footsteps from nearby enemies. The whole soundscape just sort of blends together, and so there's no immersion or decision-making based entirely on what you're hearing, unlike in most Battlefield games (including the widely-hated 2042) in which the audio alone can tell you an awful lot about the current situation.

The infantry movement also just feels sort of... stiff and clunky? I can't really pinpoint why, but it doesn't have the nice, smooth feel of a Battlefield game or even Call of Duty. I won't say it feels downright bad, but it does feel a step behind the "big players" in the MP FPS genre and I would like to see it spruced up a bit. Also, I really wish tactical sprint were removed all-together in favor of a faster sprint, even if it takes players an extra second or two to reach top speed.

And the operator system... we all know how this panned out for Battlefield 2042, becoming one of its most despised features, and so I won't go into great detail here. I would much rather they had gone with a traditional class system, rather than give us "clone wars" in which we're surrounded by teammates who look virtually identical to us, and are fighting enemies who look virtually identical to us. It's just so stupid to have dozens of clones of very specific people/personalities within a 'serious' warlike setting. I would much rather have generic soldiers.

Although I wrote more about the negatives than positives, I really do think it's a solid game and I think it will give Battlefield some serious competition until EA/DICE drop the next major game. It plays well overall and is very stable/polished all things considered. I've also been impressed with the amount of teamwork I've seen from complete randoms. In Havoc Warfare, you really do have to fight and push together in order to succeed. There's very little room for selfish 'sweats' who try and do everything all by themselves.

People don't realize a tech test is to stress test the game servers and see how well it runs on players' PCs. Its just your opinion that its trash. But also its on Unreal Engine and probably coded/developed straight out of the core of the features for Unreal Engine. if you understood how creating a game works and for a stress test after you would realize the game has an insane amount of potential. i see alot of people on tik tok saying it is fun and loving it so far but then people who think they are gamers trash talk a game that does need work but cause its straight after the mainframe/core of a game developed on Unreal engine.

Like at Valheim. That game hit 1 million players and still has 50k people at peak and when that first came out had no ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ content.

Open beta will have all the changes the community is requesting like no bots, anti-cheat, spawn fixes, etc etc. Yes it looks like BF2042 but tbh it's free to play and has a campaign, conquest/rush multiplayer and a DMZ-type mode in one client. Everything that dice promised. If you remember battlefield Play4Free. That was a sick free to play battlefield game and this game reminds me of the potential that had

[Wybrem]

I liked it in the beginning but turns out I was playing against mostly bots. Now against people i'm really only useful in vehicles and secondary, the tank explosion kills nobody when it's 1 meter off. The helicopter is horrible to fly. idk not for me if it keeps putting me against sweats.

[Bill Gates]

Publicado originalmente por Wybrem:

I liked it in the beginning but turns out I was playing against mostly bots. Now against people i'm really only useful in vehicles and secondary, the tank explosion kills nobody when it's 1 meter off. The helicopter is horrible to fly. idk not for me if it keeps putting me against sweats.

This whole new era of gaming is nothing but sweats. There are sweats in every single game now. With it free to play it will be even sweatier because sweats think gaming is some skill set that is useful in life. People sweat everything from COD to candy crush because their lives have no satisfaction so they seek it in gaming. Gone are the days of beers and gaming casually in a FPS.

You either become one or find single player experiences offline. That is your options. Well there is a 3rd and thats finding as much cheese in these games and trolling sweats. Nothing better than making a try hard cry hard.

[NutZ]

I was overly positive about this, I loved most things to be perfectly honest... That unfortunately changed, theyre kinda rigging the "test" by using bots with real user names.
On top of that there might be a heavy portion of SBMM, either way, 10 matches into the game youre now getting instantkilled in just about any situation. The whole war feeling trade blows situations are 100% gone now, and youre more dead than alive.
Im thinking we have more players than bots now, I didnt realize that I was fighting bots for the longest time, the addition of other (sweaty) players REALLY illustrates that the balance on the guns is really horrible.

So im suggesting anyone whos playing this right now to wait with the questionaries till you have played alot more games, cause it will shift heavily, which is both incredibly suspicious and a damn pity.

[Superspion Tøffi Turbo]

Based on the fact that it has literally NOTHING to do with the OG Delta Force series from Novalogic (<3) and that it's basically another hero-clone-shooter, I'd say 4/10.

[AeRoTR]

Battlefield clone mode is good 8/10.

Extraction mode is/will be clearly P2W. I also suffered many one headshot deaths through very small view angles and in a very small time window, I do not think it is possible, there must be cheat or some kind of assistance, it is unreal. Mostly happened in Hazard Mode(extraction mode), which becomes more frustrating as you lose everything.

Hazard mode has ridiculous requirements for stash or basic container upgrades, there comes in P2W and some stronger armour is very expansive but you can use your wallet, which is unlucky.

Extraction Mode is 4/10 from me.

I would play for fun, never spend a dime on this!

[Harry.Taco]

Im waiting for the DL and Install to finish. Can ya give me an hour or two? :D

[brotherofbuff]

I only played one match, It seemed like a mix of tarkov without being too hardcore and battlefield. Lot better than I expected. I was expecting the worse cause Im a old Delta Force fan and I hate the new COD games. I dont even like extraction shooters. But this one feels fair.

[WobblyTableLeg]

4/10 - not sure why they dusted the Delta Force name off the shelf for this, but it has little in common with DF. It's a kit bash of CoD:MW and BF2042 systems, full of bots, features stiff gameplay and derivative maps with no verticality. The vehicles are so pathetic I almost forgot about them. The F2P aspect will undoubtedly render weapons/customization an even worse grind than it already is, and will lead to FOTM operator/heroes to generate sales.

The positive opinions I've seen/heard are purely from the usual new game high, probably from people getting fatigue from other shooters. Play 5 rounds to soak it in and see that it is painfully mediocre.

[Zylfrax791]

Publicado originalmente por Trypticon#3:

Based on the fact that it has literally NOTHING to do with the OG Delta Force series from Novalogic (<3) and that it's basically another hero-clone-shooter, I'd say 4/10.

All that has been released is a playtest. I would wait until the full game is released before you pass judgement on whether or not it has attributes and features of the older games.

[Alex]

Extraction is fun, but needs working matchmaking or more players to put sweats with sweats and normal people with normal people, and it will be great.
Rush sucks, too chaotic, should have given teams more control and slow things down a bit. Things so fast that medics and teammates have no incentive to heal because it is better to shoot back.
But this mode sucked in Bf series as well. Don't understand those who plays it. It's like very bad Metro map, but people love it, which is sad, really.

[gacob]

Here goes my review about the warfare mode.

Overall: 2.4/5.

- Gameplay (3/5): Shooting feels good but many guns have exaggerated recoil and it barely changes modding it. Modding a gun change the stats but most of the stats are duplicated and useless. So everyone is using the same few guns (AK-74, M4A1, Scar-H, GS-775).

There is also an auto-mark enemies when the dot of your camera comes across someone, so hiding is pretty useless.

Also, as a great point, you can modify your guns.

- Operators: (1/5): The skills are fun but are really unbalanced, such as the wallhack and AoE damage from the sniper and the ultimate of one of the engineer which basically make every enemy player be unable to deal damage in an area. They also come with their own grenades, so no customization.

Also, the available guns for each operator is pretty unbalanced. The recon class (sniper) has most of the guns of the game except the advanced ones.

- Maps (2/5): The maps are beautiful but are not wide at all. They consist of a large map with several routes which both teams have to go through, causing chocking points. Some defensive positions have even too many open areas to get shot through by enemies being far away from you.

The maps also have a lot of sniper-points.

- Gamemodes (3/5): Currently in the warfare mode we only have one gamemode: a team attacks two bases while the other team defends, and the attacker team loss tickets after dying. Currently it's a mess. In many bases the defenders have an overwhelming advantage while in other the attacker does.

Also what I talked before about the maps, there're constant chocking points in which you can only advance through dozens of players dying. Some routes are even impossible to get through.

This gamemode fun at the beginning but you get sick of it pretty fast.

- Vehicles (3/5): Every vehicle is customizable. The starting kit includes auto-repair which heals you around 20-30 HP and you can always turn it on and an useless smoke since auto-marking exists.
- Main-battle tank: A main ammo which deals a lot damage to vehicles but can't kill infantry in one-hit and a secondary which is a machine gun, good for infantry but isn't very accurate.
- Infantry Fighting Vehicle: The main ammo deals a little bit damage to vehicles and can't kill infantry in one hit but it's good against infantry because you can spam it. The secondary is a guided anti-tank projectile.
- Mechanized Anti-Air: The main ammo is an anti-air gun with low damage, low cadence, low bullet speed but it is accurate. I don't remember the second ammo, sorry.
- MRAP with a 20mm/30mm cannon: The 20mm/30mm cannon is good for infantry, although again, it doesn't kill anyone in one hit. It also does a little damage against vehicles. I don't remember the secondary.
- Attack Helicopter: Can't talk about this because the control sucks, so I always crashed at its spawn point.

I would say the vehicles are too strong, as they can auto-repair themselves, the active protection has a low cooldown and the thermal smoke can make it so no one can target you with guided anti-tank.

There're also spots in the map in which you can repair the tank and matching it with the auto-repair skill, you can get your tank from 20 HP to 100 HP very quickly.

You also need 4 hits to destroy a tank, 2 if it's from below. The max ammo for anti-tanks is 3, so you need more players hitting or find a place to get more ammo (although when you get more ammo, the tank will have healed itself and you'll have to start from 0 again).

[EAX]

After almost 30 hours id say the game has ALOT of work to do before release.

The Battlefield kind of gamemode is like 7/10 to me, it has potential but its up to the devs to make use of that.

Sounddesign is a 3/10, software audio is garbage as usual, at best 16 audiochannels that get blocked by a single sniper shoot, causing footsteps to entirely vanish.

Hero abilities… ya well if nerfed to the ground to match 64 players ok… better without them.

UI is the common 2024 trash nobody wanted.
Submenues behind submenues hiding behind a submenue hidden in a submenue of that submenue from previous submenue.
Reminds me about Windows, same failure perfection.

Airplane controls are bad, animations need to step up alot, netcode is in bad shape, gunbalance isnt good…controls are laggy and unresponsive, spawnmenue is unprecise, slow and also unresponsive.
Lack of Killcam and various other things

Extraction gets a whopping total of 2/10, dont wanna deal with these menues at all and its too campy.

[8myers8]

2/10 this is not a Delta Force game one bit ..

[bisfo]

6/10 its a good filler until next BF