Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And actually it's a very good news for Telltale aswell, they can now make whatever amount of TWAU of seasons they want and however they want it!
As they've not delivered a Fables game so far that's debatable and they if they were to be completely discarding canon then it wouldn't be Fables.
Not true, did you read the article? It was DC who never paid him not Telltale.
"And they still have to pay me for the books they publish. And I'm not giving up on the other money they owe. One way or another, I intend to get my 50% of the money they've owed me for years for the Telltale game and other things."
My mistake! Hopefully DC pays him.
If that were the case he would never have made Fables public Domain. This isn't out of altruisim this is Willingham realising it would take too much to fight legally with DC. He clearly never had issues with Fables being extended to 150 issues or the various spin offs.
"The Fables comic books and graphic novels published by DC, and the storylines, characters, and elements therein, are owned by DC and protected under the copyright laws of the United States and throughout the world in accordance with applicable law and are not in the public domain," a statement sent to IGN reads. "DC reserves all rights and will take such action as DC deems necessary or appropriate to protect its intellectual property rights."
Vertigo titles were always described as creator owned however. So I'm uncertain how much Willingham holds the rights to it.
Why is His stating it seems like michael in the office but not DC stating it? Do you have any evidence to show that DC is the rightful owner of the IP as opposed to the creator?
and the entire reason for him doing it in the first place is because of not wanting to fight them.
There's plenty of stories along these lines such as group of Studio executives who once attempted to sue this tiny, unknown Japanese video game company over their character Donkey Kong despite not owning the rights to King Kong and also completely underestimated the defenseless, tiny, completely obscure Japanese company called Nintendo.
However Fables is a DC published comic presumably do have some rights to in some form.