Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not all characters are served equally well. If you liked Liara, Tali, Garrus, or Ashley / Kaidan, then you're fine. Miranda, Thane, Jacob, Samara, Grunt, Kasumi, Zaeed or even Kelly? They appear, and some even play crucial roles at certain points in the game, but generally only have small roles to play. At least Aria got a major role in an add-on (Omega DLC).
Worth playing? Absolutely.
Re: Dragon Age II The only real problem I had it was the re-used levels (which is not an issue in Mass Effect 3).
>93% Metacritic
>9/10 Gamespot
>90% PC Gamer
Seriously, reviews will tell you much more than even we can sometimes. Yes, it's good.
Also, Dragon Age 2 and 3 didnt do nearly as well critically as the first one. Mass Effect 3 on the other hand, had the same or better reviews.
If you want my opinion, ME3 is the best one in the series.
The combat is the best of the trilogy and the story is amazing at times and other times its somewhat good. The extended cut adds on to the endings which make them a little better but I only choose one ending for spoiler reasons with or without the extended cut.
You shouldn't really base what you might do on what you hear based on the ending alone. Its not as bad as people make it out to be and besides its all about the journey and experiences that you have and make throughout the trilogy and ME3 has some of the best of those, especially in the Citadel DLC.
That said, when ME3 is good, it's AMAZING. A lot of the character interaction you do get is really poignant and memorable (especially in the Citadel DLC), the combat is excellent, many of the setpieces are mindblowing, the overall sense of desperation you get from many of the squad characters and NPCs is really well-done, and you can bang me in the shower if you want.
Overall, is it worth the money and time? Yeah, definitely. It's not perfect, but go into it with the attitude of "this is another opportunity to spend some time with the characters I've come to care about," and you'll have a good time.
You should absolutely get the From Ashes, Leviathan, and Citadel DLCs as they add immensely to the story. The Omega DLC you can do without, though it does give you a nice ability (flare).
As for the ending, it's probably best to experience the "official" ending at least once (with the Extended Cut DLC, which is free). That said, I still think the official ending is nonsense so since then I have always used a modded ending. Thank god for the PC Master Race, fixing EA's messes for the last 200 years.
Its easily the worst of the 3 games, its the game where the writing can get so bad, that you'll listen to Anderson cussing like a sailor, saying things like "with the ♥♥♥♥ you did in X, you're lucky that Y", or commander shepard, when Bailey, the guy from c-sec tells him "i'll see you around Shepard", to which the galant, much respected savior of the galaxy responds with "no doubt". It feels like, at least some of ME3 was written by someone in the cast of Jersey Shore.
Other downsides to ME3, the difficulty was pushed down, Insanity on ME3 is nothing compared to ME2, skills were dumbed down, things like overload now will hit barriers AND shields, so the average casual doesn't have to wear out his 4 braincells trying to figure out the best skill for the current situation, the ending, that even with "extended cut" is just one big "WTF" for anyone that played the whole trilogy just to get that, James Vega just falls out of the sky into your squad (if you were wondering if Jersey Shore had any influence on the game, now you know), and calls you Loco if you're a guy, or Lola if you're Femshep, and Diana Allers, that was utterly sutffed into the game just to promote Jessica Chobot, when all along we could have gotten any of the journalists we already had in 1 and 2. Last but not least, branching and/or decisions have the weight of hot air in this game.
The good about ME3 tho, is that it still managed to retain some of Mass Effect and any fan is going to cherish that, you're still gonna closely relate to your old mates, be it Garrus, Tali, Mordin, Ashley/Kaidan, Wrex (or not), Liara and the lot. There are some good missions, the combat i think is a bit over the top (could have stayed like ME2, which was fine) like it was trying to please the COD crowd with all the special effects and rolling around but its still pretty acceptable and good overall, aaaaand yea, thats bout it. Citadel DLC is great if you want more time with your squadmates, Leviathan is very good, From Ashes is good and disgusting at the same time, as it should have been in your game from the very start.
Get the game in a promo, finish your ME Trilogy, you'll like some things, probably dislike some others. Its not like DA2 or DA3 that had near zero to do with Origins, ME3 manages to hit closer to home than that, go for it.
I'll be honest, I played ME1 on the lowest difficulty because the combat was annoying the hell out of me, and 2 I'm playing on whatever default is. I could stand 2 being a little more difficult but I don't really play Bioware games for difficulty honestly. If I want something hard I'll go flail around in Dark Souls for a while.
I feel that way about most of Bioware's DLC, which is why I refuse to buy any of it. The stuff that does feel like legit extra content is usually unpolished and not very fun. Bioware has terrible DLC practices in general in my opinion and I refuse to support it.
See though that's not what I didn't like about Dragon Age 2. I didn't like the needless art changes, the weird disjointed dialogue, the removal of the character creation system, the repeated side areas, or the Ubisoft style sexual comments for no reason other than "Woo edgy game devs pls buy game." It's adorable when Ubisoft does it, but it's annoying when people who write good stories start doing it.
---
Anyway I've been thinking about it and honestly I think playing another Mass Effect game directly after doing ME1 and ME2 back to back is probably a bad idea. I'm not really feeling burnt out yet but I can tell I'm starting to get there, another 30 hours probably won't help. I think I'll just wait for the holiday sales and hopefully get it cheap, and play it then. Thanks for the responses!
As someone who has held Mass Effect 2 as an unmatched personal favourite for many years now, there's quite a lot that can be said about ME3 improving on the formula, even if it has taken a few steps back. Combat is definitely the best the series has seen, with fast-paced and satisfying action and the writing in particular is, for the most part, top-notch. While the missions on Rannoch, Tuchanka, Cronos Station and Earth feature sprawling and epic battles with a tonne of emotional weight, a lot of the time the smaller missions and side-quests take centre stage.
These serve to really capture the scale of the galactic war, and the personal toll of the many sacrifices that everyone has had to make. Sound design, especially the soundtrack, is fantastic.
There's plenty of returning characters for the squad, as well as some surprising throwbacks to the previous games. Romance is more fleshed out and there's plenty of dialogue that is among the best BioWare has written.
Both Leviathan and Omega are enjoyable, but Citadel is easily some of the best DLC out there, providing the closure and cheesy fan service that a lot of people were hoping for. Javik/From Ashes is worth checking out, despite the fact that it should've been in the shipped game to begin with.
Multiplayer is surprisingly enjoyable too; I still play it from time to time.
The debacle and subsequent backlash in regards to the ending and eventual Extended Cut was colossal and will probably remain infamous for many years to come. While I don't hate it with a passion, it certainly could've been better. That being said though, is it really worth letting the last 15 minutes of a 100+ hour trilogy ruin the experience?
(You can always check out the IT for a well-crafted fanbase explanation.)
Coming from a studio that had crafted the likes of Baldur's Gate, KOTOR and Origins, Dragon Age 2 was remarkably disappointing. A short and mostly uninspired narrative with recycled environments, dull MMO-style combat and poor visual design all around, your apprehension is understandable but not warranted for the Mass Effect series. The third game may not be perfect and it certainly shows signs of cutting corners and rushed development, but it is absolutely worth your time.
I totally understand this attitude and I know I come off like a corporate shill for saying this, but the DLC in ME3 is really worth buying/playing, at least Leviathan, From Ashes, and Citadel. These three missions alone are better than 90% of the base game.
Maybe for you? I'd like to take a bit of a break after 50 hours of the same game. I'm not sure how you think you're entitled to tell me how I should be spending my time. Like I appreciate the responses, if I didn't make this thread I probably wouldn't even buy the game honestly. I was just going to stop with ME2 and maybe get back to it someday but this thread made me feel comfortable buying it next time it's on sale.
Maybe I want to play a different game next? Or do something that isn't a video game? I don't have unlimited time to do nothing but play video games. I don't see how taking a break before playing ME3 is a loss.