安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I have also been repeatedly promoting Revive on the official Battlefield.com forums since 2015 (even my signature on the official Battlefield.com forums are links to Revive), much to the awareness of EA & Dice, without having any of my posts getting disapproval from their forum/game admins.
So far EA/DICE have maintained the 'don't officially endorse while do not condemn/prohibit' stance, because they see Revive as not interfering with their business (they have abandoned BF2 business/support wise). With big future projects they have coming up, it is a waste of their time to deal anything with an abandoned game which only appeal more to niche old school players, instead of the majority mainstream younger players preferring the new BF/COD weapon/movement physics.
Legal-schmegal, shutting down Revive will not gain them anything financially (may even cost them money if they want proper legal intervention). It will also definitely hurt their reputation among BF fans, especially that a lot of current Revive BF2 players do play newer BFs and EA games, and are their current/future customers. as well.
We can only hope they keep this stance.
In my experience being in the battlelog.co community, I have never been aware of any complaints from literally thousands of players about any of battlelog.co files/downloads/online service being 'dangerous' in anyway.