Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The new one has absulutely nothing to with the Red Cross, not in a million years would they be sued for pink crosses.
And no, they didn't talk to lawyers. Otherwise the lawyers would have shown all the examples that the Red Cross allowed.
What they specifically don't want is an actual red cross.
This honestly seems like a pretty silly thing to be outraged about.
The devs need to be really paranoid to think that the red cross would come after them for a pink cross, and for the pallettes.
Just don't use red, it's not exactly hard, even more when the red cross is quite forgiving regarding lighter reds.
At least with any of your reasoning.